Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
ChipMaster0
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
ChipMaster0   5/6/2013 7:00:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel can't even compete at the Cortex A15 level, and they want to compete at the Cortex A7 level? Even if it's possible to do it, do they really want to sell $5 chips? And that's Intel's biggest problem in the mobile market, especially at the low-end: http://techdomino.com/ultra-low-end-smartphones-intel-loss/

takenmark
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
takenmark   4/7/2013 9:29:00 AM
NO RATINGS
I love this kind of phone.This is something I have been exploring about for a long time and you really provided all details of this topic http://www.archeagegolds.net | http://www.gilffxiv.us/

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
resistion   1/19/2013 3:14:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Atom was supposed to beat ARM on performance at high end rather than cost at low end. It doesn't bode high returns.

panzerboy
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
panzerboy   1/18/2013 10:48:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps a low end cell phone strategy is an admission that existing software ecologies (iOS, Android) are too much to compete with. Like how the Windows ecology stymied any different PC processors - 68000, Alpha and ARM.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
selinz   1/17/2013 6:08:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting. I really don't see the low end cell phone market growing significantly... Unless low end of tomorrow is high end of today... On another subject, the skin shaded microphone in the picture above looks like a huge mole....

kenny.g
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
kenny.g   1/17/2013 2:41:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's culture of over-designing might be hard to change,however i can see they're getting on the path on being lean. i agree with your take on the instruction sets, but that's just what their architecture based on and ARM architectures are designed on RISC which is historically meant for low power. i would be interested on how ARM is playing in the server market on being more high-performance. it's Jack vs the big giant.

daleste
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
daleste   1/17/2013 2:26:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is in third place, but are they poised to take advantage of the market growth and will they grow share? Qualcomm has a big lead. Will they continue to dominate the market? Arm is a big advantage and I don't see Intel moving to it.

giriscitek
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
giriscitek   1/17/2013 1:25:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel should reduce the amount of instructions that an Atom processor supports w.r.t x86 ISA. Otherwise the core will have issues like :- 1. Bigger area for implementation 2. More power consumption (means more/better battery tech) 3. More core / processor(or SOC) on chip will have the above 1 & 2 issues in a much bigger scale 4. Cost will always be higher because of 1 & 2 points 5. Going to leading edge process will reduce issues of points 1, 2 & 3, but how to take care of point 4 ! So, Intel should support the required subset of x86 ISA very much like what ARM, Qualcomm and others have. But having said that, many x86 (PC) software will not run by default which is Intel's biggest selling point in the name of Atom processor which ARM processor clearly lags. Striking a balance for Atom between x86 ISA & x86 code base for mobile is Intel's greatest challenge.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Intel pins hopes to low-end smartphones
old account Frank Eory   1/17/2013 12:39:51 AM
NO RATINGS
With Atom, the question used to be whether it was low power enough. Assuming the answer is now yes, then for success at the low end of the smartphone market, one would expect the next question to be whether it is lower cost or no costlier than an ARM-based apps processor. If so, that would also be decidedly un-Intel.



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...