Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Bellhop
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
Bellhop   1/24/2013 9:16:38 PM
NO RATINGS
The "sandwich" in question is actually on the market and, as far as I know, no one is making a knockoff. http://www.smuckers.com/products/group.aspx?groupId=3

bnowak0
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
bnowak0   1/21/2013 6:36:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Old Timer, as your name suggests you might be unfamiliar with this whole 'internet thing'. See, we have this tool called google. Your generation might call it a voodoo magic machine, mine calls it a search engine. Just plug in any one of the sentences that Brian supplied you with from the abstract into this voodoo machine, and presto, you have the patent staring you right in the face.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
Duane Benson   1/21/2013 5:23:01 PM
NO RATINGS
"The examiner probably restricted his prior art search to previous patents" Prior art searches are not supposed to be limited to previous patents. It certainly is possible that the examiner did that, but my understanding is that doing so would not be adequate. Of course, maybe it's so obvious to most people that it's never been written down and the patent examiner just happened to have been raised on cheese sandwiches instead of peanut butter and jelly.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
BrianBailey   1/21/2013 4:04:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks @Battar for supplying the number - I usually do, but failed to on this one. My mistake.

Battar
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
Battar   1/21/2013 2:29:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Thats US patent 6004596, and the legalistic language used to describe a sandwich is hilarious. (Perimiter coplaner to surface... edible filling juxtaposed...). The claim says, make a sandwich, remove the crust, crimp the edge so the PB doesn't squeeze out. The USPTO shouldn't grant patents for such rubbish.

dstauffer193
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
dstauffer193   1/21/2013 7:16:24 AM
NO RATINGS
We have not seen enough of the patent to even know what is patented. Everything in a patent leading up to the claims is just fluff. Until you read the claims (and only the independent ones really matter) you realy cannot tell what the patent actually protects. In the future it would be helpfull to our understanding if the patent number would be included in the article. That way we could easily read the whole patent for educational value.

Battar
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
Battar   1/20/2013 7:07:44 AM
NO RATINGS
The question of non-obviousness is subjective. It is assumed that a patent must be non-obvious to someone "ordinarily skilled in the art", which means people normally employed in the field, not experienced engineers who would come up with the same solution. In the case of sandwiches "ordinarily skilled in the art" would be any hungry 8-year old, so the patent application should have been deemed obvious. The examiner probably restricted his prior art search to previous patents. If the examiner had also turned to back issues of "Good housekeeping", I'm pretty sure he would have found something.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
BrianBailey   1/19/2013 6:38:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Lets all be nice now. This was a regular patent so both prior art and obviousness applied.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
BrianBailey   1/19/2013 6:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a regular patent and not a design patent, so the patent office thought that a) there was no prior are and b) it was non obvious.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: A crazy patent makes money
BrianBailey   1/19/2013 6:37:23 PM
NO RATINGS
No, it did not make that distinction.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...