Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
Bert22306   1/29/2013 9:30:17 PM
NO RATINGS
To the consumer, it makes little difference which of the 60 GHz schemes "wins." To the consumer, this will in essence be a wireless HDMI link, of limited range and limited wall-penetrating acumen, but way more bandwidth than you could hope for in the 2.4 or 5 GHz bands. So it's all good stuff. I see that it is called 802.11ad, and that products combining 802.11ad and 802.11n are already being demoed. This is good. It would allow standard house coverage of WiFi, plus this "wireless HDMI" link within a room, for example. The interesting historical aspect of this is that the 60 GHz band started being considered when it became obvious that the ultrawideband (UWB) radio hype wasn't panning out. Remember that hype a few years ago? It fills that same functional role, though. Short range, say 10 meters or so, very high bandiwdth wireless.

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
rick merritt   1/29/2013 7:21:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the future looks bleak for Silicon Image's UltraGig aka WirelessHD given the WiFi Alliance has embraced the WiGig Alliance's 60 GHz technology as its own and part of its road map. So WiFi will have 60 GHz too and it will be an industry standard unlike UltraGig/Wireless HD which did not get backing from the folks it aimed to disrupt. The empire fought back--and won it seems.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
Bert22306   1/26/2013 9:55:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Think of it this way, then. Instead of spending money on a Miracast to HDMI conversion box, and the Miracast transmitter at the tablet, make yourself a smart TV. Connect a PC to the TV, via HDMI, and control the PC with a wireless mouse (and wireless keyboard, when and if necessary). Now you have a really smart TV that can stand on its own, and the tablet can be used for anything else. This is reality too. It happens to be my reality. I went this route when I saw that the CE companies didn't know how to design a smart TV. So I gave up on them and did the obvious. Without waiting for Miracast or anything else.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
Bert22306   1/26/2013 9:46:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Is is not simpler to have a low-bandwidth remote mouse next to you, to remotely control a smart TV, than to have to use a tablet that costs about as much as the set itself? If you already have a tablet, great. Use it while watching TV, if you like, for something more useful than as a duplicate screen? It just seems silly to create such an expensive and bandwidth-hungry remote control for a TV, is all. Perhaps the question proponents of this idea should ask, is the uncompressed video link electronics required at the TV and at the tablet going to cost LESS than a low cost thin client built into smart TVs? Maybe using Atom or ARM processors? EVEN IF there will be times when you want to put those photos from your smart phone on the TV set, does that mean that all of your Internet TV watching must tie up a tablet too? I watch Internet TV all the time, on my TV, and have yet to need a tablet to do so.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
Robotics Developer   1/25/2013 2:14:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I am all for increased bandwidth, lower frame rate loss, improved resolutions, etc.... but I am not finding either UltraGig or Miracast very exciting. Perhaps it is because I do not own a smart phone and have limited interest in watching TV? I see the 60Ghz frequency as being too short range for really being useful in the home (say floor to floor or end to end of the house). The cost adder for all the devices that the user would want to have supported also is a draw back, how many manufacturers would willingly add $10 or $15 to their product on a maybe future usefulness?

tb1
User Rank
Rookie
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
tb1   1/23/2013 11:07:44 PM
NO RATINGS
What if you don't have a smart TV? I think you can get a Miracast to HDMI adapter, then you can control any television with your tablet. Instant Smart TV, with a touchscreen remote!

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
docdivakar   1/23/2013 7:09:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Correction: ...it is NOT efficient to stream content from Internet to SmartTV from the handheld!

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
docdivakar   1/23/2013 7:04:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Junko, it is NOT efficient to stream content from Internet to SmartTV! I can do that simply by transmitting the hyperlink (a couple of Kbytes at the most!) to the SmartTV from my tablet (if one doesn't want to use the TV remote to do that). I can do that today with my smart phone and WiFi. What makes sense is to stream stored content from a handheld. But any day that works better in a wired manner like plugging in a USB storage device to your TV! In the end, it is the consumer adoption that will prove or kill UltraGig. Time will tell. I just don't like too much Emag smog in my living room! MP Divakar

Sparky_Watt
User Rank
Rookie
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
Sparky_Watt   1/23/2013 6:26:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Simple. Your Smart TV is across the room. Your tablet or Smart Phone is in your lap. Mirroring the video strikes me as an inefficient way to do this, but having a console app in your tablet routing whatever you want to your TV makes all kinds of sense.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: UltraGig: Proprietary blunder or 60GHz future?
junko.yoshida   1/23/2013 6:20:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I think something got lost in translation in this debate. Yes, if you can stream all that Internet content directly to your smart TV, that's all the better and efficient. But the reality is that many consumers today already have a smartphone and/or a tablet. Sitting in a living room with your kids, chances are, some of them are surfing the Net on a tablet or smartphone already, while you are watching a big screen TV. Wouldn't it be nice, if a relevant (or irrelevant) content found on a smartphone can be beamed onto a big screen TV during a commercial break, and share the laugh? I am talking about the reality of multi-screen era in a living room. It's already here. If so, how best to connect those multiple screens?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Engineering Pop Culture!
Chuck Maggi, Engineering Manager

Two Cocky Techs Get Their Comeuppance
Chuck Maggi, Engineering Manager
2 comments
Two swaggering technicians are dramatically humbled when they flip the power switch on a high-voltage simulator.

The Engineering Life - Around the Web
Dwight Bues, Systems Engineer

The Case of the Nonexistent Component
Dwight Bues, Systems Engineer
Post a comment
Every engineer has likely had the unfortunate experience of verifying a part's availability with a vendor, only to have the part ultimately wind up either not getting produced or ...

Engineer's Bookshelf
Caleb Kraft

The Martian: A Delightful Exploration of Math, Mars & Feces
Caleb Kraft
6 comments
To say that Andy Weir's The Martian is an exploration of math, Mars, and feces is a slight simplification. I doubt that the author would have any complaints, though.

Design Contests & Competitions
Caleb Kraft

Join The Balancing Act With April's Caption Contest
Caleb Kraft
58 comments
Sometimes it can feel like you're really performing in the big tent when presenting your hardware. This month's caption contest exemplifies this wonderfully.

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)