Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
GSMD
User Rank
Manager
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
GSMD   6/19/2013 11:17:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Since the HEVC patents are invalid in India, would be interesting to see adoption here. The patent wars have started here too but mostly getting thrown out since SW patents are taboo, period. Yahoo realised this the hard way last year !

William Miller
User Rank
CEO
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
William Miller   3/5/2013 3:56:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Cutting HD movie size in half and reducing the bandwidth is a pure revolution! Faster connection for the same number of requests means less pressure on the servers. HEVC sounds to be another cool thing to improve our digital life, make it faster and more comfy! schengen travel insurance

zhgreader
User Rank
Rookie
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
zhgreader   1/29/2013 4:03:49 AM
NO RATINGS
I was told the H.265 has been approved not lonh before.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
Bert22306   1/29/2013 2:29:39 AM
NO RATINGS
I take claims like that with a grain of salt, Rick. The whole point of VP8 and VP9 is to avoid having to pay royalties, not to develop a technically better codec. And there's an army of companies developing the MPEG compression schemes. So I find it very unlikely that improvement over HEVC would be real, long lasting, or across the board. Besides, HEVC encoders will continue to be improved too, as all other generations of encoders have been. H.262 encoders, for example, those used for MPEG-2 compression, are now capable of at least twice the coding efficiency they had when they first came out. If you look at the techniques used in H.262 vs H.264 vs H.265, you can see that the improvements are quite progressive and I'd say almost predictable. You allow bigger and smaller blocks, you allow more block aspect ratios, you tweak the entropy coding schemes permitted, you allow interframes to be spread further apart, you use filtering techniques to mask blocking artifacts. The VP series don't take a drastically different approach in achieving compression. They're still discrete cosine transform (or the derivative integer transform) algorithms, so at best, any improvement might be slight. All of these schemes have to deal with the realities of computing power, especially in the encoding devices, so I doubt any real advantage with VP9 (except the royalty issue, perhaps).

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
rick merritt   1/29/2013 12:51:57 AM
NO RATINGS
BTW, I'd love to hear other opinions about VP9 which Wikipedia says hopes to "improve to the point where it would have better compression efficiency than High Efficiency Video Coding"

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
Bert22306   1/29/2013 12:10:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Good point about wireless broadband in mobile devices. That would benefit from all the compression efficiency possible, and the handheld devices have a short lifespan anyway. So that might help push HEVC along. But in these applications, the improvement won't be to cut bit rate by half. These systems already use H.264. I doubt any are still doing MPEG-2 compression? Going by the popular guesstimates, I'd expect no more than a 25-30 percent drop maximum, depending as always on the source material. Still significant, though.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
rick merritt   1/28/2013 5:52:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Understood re cable guys still on MPEG 2. As I understand it from Setos, its the satellite guys (along with Blu-ray) who helped kick start MPEG 4 Part 10 for HD.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
rick merritt   1/28/2013 5:50:03 PM
NO RATINGS
The MPEG group formally released the final draft of HEVC over the weekend after its Geneva meeting See http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/meetings/103

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
old account Frank Eory   1/28/2013 4:19:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, cable MVPDs still use MPEG2. Many systems are constrained for bandwidth, but the economics of migrating all those set-top boxes to H.264 clearly has not yet been favorable -- like you said, too much hassle for too little gain. I agree that HEVC will be essential for 4K UHDTV to become mainstream, but I think that even without UHDTV, HEVC will be a huge boon for mobile video. Yes, internet TV in general is hampered by speed issues for all but the fastest broadband connections, but it is far worse for the average mobile viewer. Even when LTE becomes more ubiquitous and mobile download speeds are less of an issue, carriers are moving toward pay-for-use data plans, which will still give most users reason to pause before watching lengthy videos over a cellular connection. But with HEVC cutting the amount of data in half, that constraint is greatly reduced.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: How HEVC could remake Internet video—or not
Bert22306   1/26/2013 12:52:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Rick, as far as I know, cable companies use MPEG-2 compression only (H.262). Just like over the air TV. Internet TV is where H.264 is used extensively. But more to the point. Yes, royalties are a big deal, of course. But leaving that aside, does a codec need a sugar-daddy? Or does it need a killer application? My thinking has always been, it needs an obvious requirement, a killer app. MPEG-2 was essential for DTV and HDTV. Therefore, it was adopted. And like any standard, it's great initially, to ensure interoperability, but eventually the standard becomes a hindrance to progress. AVC was essential for acceptable quality Internet streaming, over the popular broadband Internet speeds. (It's really quite good, even when viewed on HDTV sets with ADSL for broadband.) And AVC was also essential for HDTV from satellite TV. Two killer apps. Sugar-daddy or no, I think HEVC is essential for 4K video. It makes 4K video viable over many different media, just as MPEG-2 made HDTV viable. My bet is, if people go into stores and fall in love with 4K video, HVEC's future is cemented. If not, it's just like asking the question, how come OTA and cable TV have not migrated to H.264? Answer: too much hassle for too little gain.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
7 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Max Maxfield

Juggling a Cornucopia of Projects
Max Maxfield
20 comments
I feel like I'm juggling a lot of hobby projects at the moment. The problem is that I can't juggle. Actually, that's not strictly true -- I can juggle ten fine china dinner plates, but ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
41 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
151 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)