Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Qualcomm joins IMEC core CMOS R&D program
Peter Clarke   1/29/2013 9:33:47 AM
NO RATINGS
It certainly was the case that most of the companies that are mentioned have researchers on secondment to Leuven, Belgium. This gives them the opportunity to run wafers on EUV machines...test structures and so on. A lot of effort goes into defining the scope of the intellectual property so that the companies know which bits are communal IP which all the participants get to share.

FraAmelia
User Rank
Rookie
re: Qualcomm joins IMEC core CMOS R&D program
FraAmelia   1/29/2013 9:28:55 AM
NO RATINGS
So resistor what is your opinion about this decision by Qualcomm? If IP generation at a research institute is a complication, what does Qualcomm expect from this collaboration? is it only a sort of elite club or you think that something good will come out from this joint research? I am based in EU so I am welcoming any initiative that will help Europe not to be relegated at the periphery in the semi world

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Qualcomm joins IMEC core CMOS R&D program
resistion   1/29/2013 4:26:12 AM
NO RATINGS
A research institute is essentially a technology development insurance company. Companies of course want exclusive licenses, which does make IP generation at a research institute a complication.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Qualcomm joins IMEC core CMOS R&D program
eewiz   1/29/2013 4:11:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I believe its mostly like jointly funding the research. IMEC will be hiring personnel and doing the research .. IP shared among investors..

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Qualcomm joins IMEC core CMOS R&D program
DrQuine   1/28/2013 11:47:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Sounds like good news for the nanoelectronics research institute IMEC. What I'm curious about is how all these companies will be collaborating. Is the institute serving as facility where research can be done (like a machine shop renting out space for development) or are the participating companies jointly funding research. Sounds like an intellectual property challenge - especially with all the cross licensed patents already in play.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
49 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
121 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)