Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
Mrchipguy
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
Mrchipguy   2/6/2013 3:57:45 PM
NO RATINGS
SOI industry talk has been going on for 20 years without commercial success. AMD dropping SOI due to high cost, design IP, and no chip level advantage FD-SOI has the same issues - high cost issue: (single supplier), - Physical design IP not compatible (ESD ckts, poor high voltage devices, limited and DRC restrictions on multi threashold devices)

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
krisi   2/6/2013 3:18:42 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you Giorgio...interesting comments about hybridization zone...would you (or STM in general) be interested to describe FD-SOI technology for the upcoming Semiconductor Devices book I am editing? kris.iniewski@gmail.com

Adele.Hars
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
Adele.Hars   2/6/2013 7:15:44 AM
NO RATINGS
@resistion & Kresearch - FD-SOI scales to 10nm -- see http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4403224/FDSOI-roadmap-renames-20-nm-node-as-14-nm. @Kresearch - wafer capacity is in place -- see http://www.advancedsubstratenews.com/2012/12/the-transition-to-fully-depleted/. @the_floating_gate re: cost/yield -- see Handel Jones showing *major* savings w/FD-SOI (who btw presented at the Common Platform Technology Forum yesterday) http://www.advancedsubstratenews.com/2012/11/ibs-study-concludes-fd-soi-most-cost-effective-technology-choice-at-28nm-and-20nm/

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
the_floating_ gate   2/6/2013 5:28:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Ciao Giorgio SOI wafers/substrates are significantly more expensive compared to bulk. On the other hand SOI requires less capex because the wafers are preimplanted requiring less equipment at fab level. It's a trade off between fix cost versus variable cost. If you can improve yields very quickly SOI is promising - if not you're wasting very expensive silicon. It's a trade off and Bohr said they were looking closely at both ... SOI and bulk...and he also did not exclude that some chipmakers might come out with SOI approach... BTW I spent lots of time in Agrate (when it was still SGS) as well in Grenoble (Thompson) and of course I love Catania - hey a fab in Sicily - who can ask for more. Good luck

Cesana
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
Cesana   2/6/2013 3:32:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Thank you Kris for your question about design portability. 28nm FD-SOI technology adopts the same design rules as ISDA 28LP HKMG gate-first process, with minor changes and some incremental addition for the FD-SOI specific constructs (like the rules for the hybridation zone, allowing the integration of bulk "hybrid" devices in the FD-SOI technology). The PDK include scripts for automatic porting of schematics and layouts, easing the porting job. Of course, digital libraries will need to be re-extracted and recharacterized, while analog blocks will require to be readjusted/ retuned because of the different electrical performances of FD-SOI technology. Giorgio Cesana, STMicroelectronics

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
resistion   2/6/2013 12:29:55 AM
NO RATINGS
FDSOI out of gas at 14 nm?

Kresearch
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
Kresearch   2/5/2013 11:32:46 PM
NO RATINGS
It is kind of same dilemma like DUV immersion. When down to 14nm, both of them will be out of gas. How come foundry would pump in resources for this temporary solution which extend for 2 generations? Besides, SOI wafer capacity(Soitec)and Technology(ST)would be roadblockers for proliferation.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: ARM rates FDSOI process as "good technology"
krisi   2/5/2013 5:41:34 PM
NO RATINGS
"The physical IP we need to create is essentially the same [as for bulk CMOS]." - this can't be true. Layout and DRC rules are bound to be different. Is there any way to automatically transfer the layout data from bulk CMOS to FD SOI? I doubt it

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...