The complexity of today’s SoC simply doesn’t allow for stitch & ship mentality.
In fact verification teams nowadays spend much more time at the higher integration levels. This can be easily recognized in the numerous heterogeneous prototyping environment,
e.g. virtual prototypes coupled with FPGA platforms, and the amount of testing performed
prior and after tapeout.
There certainly is a difference between consumer electronics and military, but every SoC team who wants to be successful has to obey the facts and schedule accordingly.
Many of our customers have horror stories to tell about previous SoC projects with silicon bugs that should have been caught before fabrication. Of course we can't share those stories and offer "proof" that there is a stitch-and-ship mentality at work. I would say that most verification engineers understand the risk this practice entails but are given neither the schedule nor the resources to do anything better.
Excellent article, yes there is this stupid mentality that if the IP's are proven you can get a chip taped out in 2-3 months, without really giving thought on the integration. I feel that ASIC engineering has now become more system oriented which needs more system level thinking, as most of the blocks are available in some or the other form of RTL IP. But what is lacking is acceptance of the same, and lack of ASIC engineers understanding the systems.
It is high time that software engineers work very closely with hardware engineers on SOC, for sure success.
Thanks for this excellent and thoughtful article, Maheen; I hope that newcomers to our profession are paying attention.
All too often, I see a "lego-block" mentality, that neglects the reality of total system integration... until sober reality bites you in the butt!
I sincerely hope that not many SoC teams are practicing stitch & ship. To say it is a recipe for disaster is stating the obvious. Every system requires system engineering and verification against clear requirements.
It's easy to discuss but hard to practice. Sometimes you'll only catch the most insidious things after it's been fabricated under the most reasonable assumptions and out in the field for some time. So the practice of sampling needs to be established.
This is a very timely article. I think that SOC development teams will be slower to embrace this than the emerging 3D/SIP development teams.
To help the 3D movement, I recently embraced a new Conference being sponsored by the IPC, the IPC ESTC which has been created to help bring the bridges of knowledge from the chips to the systems closer together.
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.