Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
rick merritt   2/12/2013 5:35:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I neglected to add this significant quote from Gary Patton: "At 7 nm you have no choice and have to go to triple or quad patterning, and I expect some of that will creep in at 10 nm as well."

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
krisi   2/12/2013 6:15:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Patterning at 7nm is obviously tough but sounds people think it can be done...but is Mosfet still working at 7nm?...what is Ion/Ioff ratio?...how many dopant atoms are within transistor volume? what about statistical variations that could be huge?

Yog-Sothoth
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
Yog-Sothoth   2/12/2013 7:32:14 PM
NO RATINGS
The lattice constant of Si is about 5.4 angstroms so 70/5.4 = 13 atoms of silicon...

Alex33
User Rank
Rookie
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
Alex33   2/12/2013 8:23:05 PM
NO RATINGS
That is the length of the whole unit cell. There are more atoms within the cell since it is a diamond crystal structure. Actual figures depend on orientation but for a 100 direction it would be 4x that.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/12/2013 11:47:12 PM
NO RATINGS
The Rayleigh formula only has meaning if there are enough photons for defining the feature. EUV doesn't have enough, so the target dose continually increases as feature size shrinks.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/12/2013 11:52:45 PM
NO RATINGS
So the difficulties are the source power also has to continually increase, and the resist outgassing increases.

help.fulguy
User Rank
Manager
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
help.fulguy   2/13/2013 3:02:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Meanwhile Intel is laughing at these 3 bumbling idiots. They tried Gate First and lost. They keep losing. They keep talking new tech, while Intel will release the new technology.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
GroovyGeek   2/13/2013 4:39:08 AM
NO RATINGS
IBM has been mostly irrelevant to semiconductor process technology for at least a decade. I doubt many outside IBM can clear state why they even still do it. They certainly don't make any money from it. Yerning for the glory days perhaps?

HS_SemiPro
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
HS_SemiPro   2/13/2013 5:39:27 AM
NO RATINGS
IBM Makes its money from Selling Enterprise Systems, that include full bundle including Software, Servers, data warehouse, and services. IBM Chip tech is developed for its server Chips and related SOCs, That gives them tech advantage over competition.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/13/2013 5:40:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Well Intel has been changing its HKMG process from 45 to 32 to 22. Probably too busy to laugh. Who knows maybe they'll come out with their own gate first approach.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
41 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
18 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)