Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
krisi   2/15/2013 3:42:41 PM
NO RATINGS
What happened to CogniVue? ICP sounds like a great idea

vratford
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
vratford   2/14/2013 5:59:44 PM
NO RATINGS
While I was at Xilinx we developed the ZYNQ platform with Embedded Vision applications in mind and helped start the Alliance. With thousands of design wins and early successes in ADAS look for some cool products to emerge. Pleased to see Alliance membership up to 30 companies now with many of them semiconductor and IP companies with interesting product roadmaps targeting vision apps.

SimonCMorris
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
SimonCMorris   2/14/2013 4:49:44 PM
NO RATINGS
CogniVue's (small semiconductor IP company in Canada) thesis in 2010 was that world needs an Image Cognition Processor (ICP) for efficient vision processing like the world need a GPU for 2D/3D graphics processing in the late 1990s. Bring on the ICPs. Real-time face recognition and gesture recognition as part of next-gen UIs will bog down multi-core processors as the UI is on all the time. The depth map generation is in particular a big challenge. A specialized programmable vision core will be needed. Furthermore - there are no standards for vision - like video codecs - they will be different algorithms used. Bring on the ICPs.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
DMcCunney   2/14/2013 2:19:28 AM
NO RATINGS
@freddsd3234343242: "Cheaper and better Imaging IP cores means another blow for the Japanese camera manufactures who already have tough competition from phones." Not that tough. If you just want to capture a quick picture of something to upload to Facebook, your smartphone may be just the ticket. If you want to do real photography, a smartphone isn't what you use. Digital cameras still rely on top-quality optics to capture the image. You can do a lot in software with what you capture, but you are ultimately constrained by what you got in the first place. Smartphones may eat the market for low end cameras because they'll do about as good a job, but that's about as far as they'll go. If I'm Nikon or Canon or the like, I'm not quaking in my boots at this. I'm investigating what incorporating this into the higher end gear I sell might offer my customers.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
krisi   2/13/2013 4:19:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Face recognition will be big...should we start talking about smart imagining?!

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 2:46:57 PM
NO RATINGS
i miss the simpler days. When brands meant something

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
junko.yoshida   2/13/2013 1:59:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The fact that imaging and vision algorithms are advancing leaps and bounds every day makes it a good enough reason to use a programmable IP core, I think. By the time you are ready with your new imaging ASIC to specifically tailored to one algorithm, the market may be already seeing the birth of another vision algorithm you may want.

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 1:11:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Cheaper and better Imaging IP cores means another blow for the Japanese camera manufactures who already have tough competition from phones. Combined with their failing lithography devision, this could be the last blow for them. Remember all the crappy mp3 and mp4 players from Taiwan and China? That was due to generic IP cores.

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 11:48:35 AM
NO RATINGS
* imaging core

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 11:47:58 AM
NO RATINGS
I still don't get why 'we need an imagine core'.. Should Canon or Nikon or Apple abandon their ASIC designs and instead buy one of these IP cores from Tensilica vs. Ceva? Why?? What is the benefit of using a generic IP for all brands and devices?



Most Recent Comments
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
6 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)