Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
krisi   2/15/2013 3:42:41 PM
NO RATINGS
What happened to CogniVue? ICP sounds like a great idea

vratford
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
vratford   2/14/2013 5:59:44 PM
NO RATINGS
While I was at Xilinx we developed the ZYNQ platform with Embedded Vision applications in mind and helped start the Alliance. With thousands of design wins and early successes in ADAS look for some cool products to emerge. Pleased to see Alliance membership up to 30 companies now with many of them semiconductor and IP companies with interesting product roadmaps targeting vision apps.

SimonCMorris
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
SimonCMorris   2/14/2013 4:49:44 PM
NO RATINGS
CogniVue's (small semiconductor IP company in Canada) thesis in 2010 was that world needs an Image Cognition Processor (ICP) for efficient vision processing like the world need a GPU for 2D/3D graphics processing in the late 1990s. Bring on the ICPs. Real-time face recognition and gesture recognition as part of next-gen UIs will bog down multi-core processors as the UI is on all the time. The depth map generation is in particular a big challenge. A specialized programmable vision core will be needed. Furthermore - there are no standards for vision - like video codecs - they will be different algorithms used. Bring on the ICPs.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
DMcCunney   2/14/2013 2:19:28 AM
NO RATINGS
@freddsd3234343242: "Cheaper and better Imaging IP cores means another blow for the Japanese camera manufactures who already have tough competition from phones." Not that tough. If you just want to capture a quick picture of something to upload to Facebook, your smartphone may be just the ticket. If you want to do real photography, a smartphone isn't what you use. Digital cameras still rely on top-quality optics to capture the image. You can do a lot in software with what you capture, but you are ultimately constrained by what you got in the first place. Smartphones may eat the market for low end cameras because they'll do about as good a job, but that's about as far as they'll go. If I'm Nikon or Canon or the like, I'm not quaking in my boots at this. I'm investigating what incorporating this into the higher end gear I sell might offer my customers.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
krisi   2/13/2013 4:19:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Face recognition will be big...should we start talking about smart imagining?!

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 2:46:57 PM
NO RATINGS
i miss the simpler days. When brands meant something

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
junko.yoshida   2/13/2013 1:59:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The fact that imaging and vision algorithms are advancing leaps and bounds every day makes it a good enough reason to use a programmable IP core, I think. By the time you are ready with your new imaging ASIC to specifically tailored to one algorithm, the market may be already seeing the birth of another vision algorithm you may want.

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 1:11:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Cheaper and better Imaging IP cores means another blow for the Japanese camera manufactures who already have tough competition from phones. Combined with their failing lithography devision, this could be the last blow for them. Remember all the crappy mp3 and mp4 players from Taiwan and China? That was due to generic IP cores.

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 11:48:35 AM
NO RATINGS
* imaging core

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Yoshida in NY: Why do we need an imaging IP core?
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 11:47:58 AM
NO RATINGS
I still don't get why 'we need an imagine core'.. Should Canon or Nikon or Apple abandon their ASIC designs and instead buy one of these IP cores from Tensilica vs. Ceva? Why?? What is the benefit of using a generic IP for all brands and devices?



Most Recent Comments
Wnderer
 
David Ashton
 
mikehibbett
 
dwhess
 
David Ashton
 
LarryM99
 
David Ashton
 
mikehibbett
 
goafrit
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Saddleback Sale – It's Happy Dance Time
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
It's no secret that I'm a huge fan of the products from Saddleback Leather. As I sit here at my desk, I'm wearing one of their 1¾" wide Tow Belts, upon which rests one of their Belt ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
Post a comment
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
47 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...