Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: TransferJet to demo speedy wireless at MWC
RGARVIN640   5/9/2013 8:17:46 PM
In battery powered applications, that require security, the TransferJet is a much more valid choice to transfer large amounts of data. As long as the two device can be situated within an inch of each other.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
re: TransferJet to demo speedy wireless at MWC
Peter Clarke   2/19/2013 9:44:41 AM
My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. I have corrected it in copy.

User Rank
re: TransferJet to demo speedy wireless at MWC
anon3860072   2/19/2013 5:51:09 AM
TransferJet is another perfect of how ignorant the Japanese are. The Japanese OEMs are wasting their already thinning finance and resources to build a standards which does not really benefit the real-world applications! As Bert and many engineers have pointed out now and before, existing technologies like 802.11 offer extension which can cover the purpose. However, for the sake of being different and to leverage at what they are still strong at (i.e. DSLR, DSC, multi-function printer, etc.), the Japanese OEMs are ganging together to tempt the non-Japanese OEMs. I hope none of the Taiwanese/American/European are stupid enough to follow. Let the Japanese OEMs waste their money, if they so choose. The rest should just stand by and watch the Japanese OEMs deplete their hard-earned money in the bank!

User Rank
re: TransferJet to demo speedy wireless at MWC
Bert22306   2/18/2013 10:11:18 PM
Yeah, definitely not 4.48 MHz. This broadband NFC is a useful concept these days. And it should be considerably easier to achieve than an equivalent channel capacity over, say, WiFi. For one thing, NFC devices don't have to share the frequency channel with multiple client devices at the same time! Interesting graphic. In truth, though, WiFi includes the distances shown for PAN. I'm quite sure that my WiFi printer is not more than 1 meter away from my WiFi access point!

User Rank
re: TransferJet to demo speedy wireless at MWC
xuzhemin   2/18/2013 7:30:29 PM
"... using a radio carrier center frequency of typically 4.48-MHz." 4.48GHz! Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...