Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
eewiz   2/26/2013 6:20:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting! So Intel is going into full fledged foundry business. Get the high end customers first and then aim for mid end and leave the low end for others. TSMC/GF got a thing to worry.

Kresearch
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
Kresearch   2/26/2013 8:03:25 AM
NO RATINGS
It sounds a little step foreward for Intel. The tipping point comes when Intel gets foundry orders from Apple, Qualcomm or Nvidia. Let's wait and see then.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
junko.yoshida   2/26/2013 1:05:39 PM
NO RATINGS
So, first Achronix, then Altera!

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
Wilco1   2/26/2013 1:25:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Do you seriously believe Intel will fab ARM SoCs for all its competitors on its latest processes? That won't happen unless Intel spins off its expensive idling fabs, or if demand for x86 CPUs falls significantly.

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
Garcia-Lasheras   2/26/2013 1:36:17 PM
NO RATINGS
...and don't forget Tabula. Three different programmable logic devices companies are already using Intel foundry. It was hard to imagine that a couple of years ago.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
rick merritt   2/26/2013 2:03:06 PM
NO RATINGS
You can bet Quaqlcomm and Nvidia won't be on the list...but maybe Apple, Cisco and...?

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
de_la_rosa   2/26/2013 2:08:11 PM
NO RATINGS
DUV immersion lithography is really impressive.

Navaneethan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
Navaneethan   2/26/2013 2:53:02 PM
NO RATINGS
New partners. New competitors. Now, Altera needs to work with competitors ARM & Intel as well as competitors TSMC and Intel... Its going to be interesting.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
rick merritt   2/26/2013 3:10:10 PM
NO RATINGS
This quote just added to the story: "It is not Intel's objective to become a general foundry service provider," said Len Jelinek, a chief analyst at IHS iSuppli. Rather it aims "to select a few high volume [foundry] clients [that] provide Intel with an additional revenue stream to help defer the cost of its advanced manufacturing capability," he said.

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to make 14-nm FPGAs for Altera
chipmonk0   2/26/2013 4:54:45 PM
NO RATINGS
In a world dominated increasingly by ARM based designs at the expense of X86, device & mfg are Intel's remaining strengths. But to stay ahead of the pack and generate enough revenue for R&D and next gen Fabs, Intel needs volume. Otherwise TSMC will soon catch up. To maintain R&D & process lead Intel must not only generate enough revenue of its own but also deny TSMC and Samsung the tech creds and huge revenues they have been making from Foundry service. Even though demand for Mobile chips is expected to grow at 30+ %, when it comes to tech creds. and markup ( ASP ) it is still a zero sum game. Just look at TSMC vs older UMC at 28 nm. As Intel's cash cow PC business begins to stagnate in spite of their best design / marketing effort, they need to find new volume, FPGAs and network processors ain't gonna do it. Mobile is the obvious answer. Pushing own high end designs ( but with 32 nm transistors - no better than Foundries ! ) as a continuation of the top dog mentality ( a byproduct of the x86 monopoly ) has bombed. Instead Intel should accept reality and implement a nuanced strategy to grow its Mobile business, but still leveraging their lead in process / mfg. tech : 1. Commit to QC and AAPL no competition in leading edge chips for Mobile ( what does US anti-trust laws have to say about that ? any exceptions during the Great Recession ? ) 2. Offer these large Fabless co.s Foundry service from Intel's upcoming 20,14 nm Fabs( 2 nodes, well ahead of TSMC / Samsung ). 3. develop its own non ARM architecture & processor / baseband chips ( like MediaTek ) for low end Smartphones & Tablets ( perhaps cheap Windows Phablets to replace Laptops ) aimed at emerging markets but still using its leading node ( 20 nm ) Fabs & therefore lower power ( compared to TSMC or Samsung )

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Saddleback Sale – It's Happy Dance Time
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
It's no secret that I'm a huge fan of the products from Saddleback Leather. As I sit here at my desk, I'm wearing one of their 1¾" wide Tow Belts, upon which rests one of their Belt ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
Post a comment
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
47 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...