Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Ramifr
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale preps IoT attack with tiny MCU
Ramifr   2/27/2013 4:58:23 PM
NO RATINGS
What would be typical power consumption per minute assuming transmission of one byte of information once every minute.

ZackS
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale preps IoT attack with tiny MCU
ZackS   2/27/2013 4:12:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Power consumption is a very important factor in IoT's wireless devices...is this information available?

Jack.L
User Rank
CEO
re: Freescale preps IoT attack with tiny MCU
Jack.L   2/27/2013 2:14:16 PM
NO RATINGS
If you were designing a single product for today, then 8 or 16 bit may be fine. If you are starting out in the architectural decision stage of a project targeting Internet connectivity of some sort, then would you really want to have the potential to be hobbled by an 8 or 16 bit architecture? Comparatively, a 16 bit architecture is going to offer limited code advantage over 32 bit ARM and with expected die shrinks over time, that pretty much goes away. With 8 bits you will be quickly running into performance issues not to mention limited off the shelf support in terms of software IP (stacks, etc.) Add in potential time to market advantages from common tool chains and you have what is likely the best architecture for the targeted market.

pica0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Freescale preps IoT attack with tiny MCU
pica0   2/27/2013 10:33:49 AM
NO RATINGS
In my opinion " Why does it need ... ?" is the wrong question. I prefer the "Is it more economical to ... ?" pattern. One big cost driver here in Europe and I think also in the USA and Japan are human resources. The big human resource specific advantage of the ARM eco system is, ARM M*, R* and A* all share the same ISA concepts and the same tool chain. As a result teaching/learning efforts are minimized.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Freescale preps IoT attack with tiny MCU
chanj0   2/27/2013 6:48:40 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm very interested in knowing the power consumption and more importantly, the operating condition. 32kB flash and 4kB SRAM do not sound a lot. I've the same thought as Daleste. For the application areas mentioned in the article, I feel like 16bits might very much be enough.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Freescale preps IoT attack with tiny MCU
daleste   2/27/2013 3:47:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting. Why does it need to be a 32 bit MCU for IoT? Wouldn't 16 bit do, or even 8 bit?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
5 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).