Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Single chip wraps up display, audio, touch
old account Frank Eory   2/28/2013 9:34:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Four-wire resistive touch sensing? It's been quite a few years since I've seen one of those plastic, squishy touchscreens -- at least here in the U.S.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
re: Single chip wraps up display, audio, touch
DMcCunney   2/28/2013 6:31:12 PM
NO RATINGS
"I still don't think a 32 bit microcontroller is the right processor for these devices." Why *not* use a 32 bit microcontroller? The driver is usually cost, not capability. As long as it will do the needed job, you use a 16 bit or even 8 bit controller because it's *cheaper*. What happens if that's *not* the case, and there isn't a significant cost difference in using a 32 bit core? The ARM Cortex M-0 mentioned elsewhere is arguably overkill for the stated usage, but the ARM architecture is widely deployed and well understood with an existing toolchain to support development and engineers familiar with it. What you wind up with is capability you won't use, but you don't care because you get the advantages of familiarity and lower time-to-market at a total price that's probably comparable to using a lesser controller.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
re: Single chip wraps up display, audio, touch
DMcCunney   2/28/2013 6:23:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I suspect it's host controller architecture agnostic. It's a separate component, communicated with by the host controller over a bus. As long as the host can communicate with it and use the functions it provides, you likely don't *care* about host architecture. It could be ARM, x86, MIPS or something else entirely.

JohnM555
User Rank
Rookie
re: Single chip wraps up display, audio, touch
JohnM555   2/28/2013 5:18:23 PM
NO RATINGS
There is no statement about the recommended bit architecture for the host controller.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Single chip wraps up display, audio, touch
daleste   2/28/2013 4:32:10 AM
NO RATINGS
This sounds like a good device for IoT applications. I still don't think a 32 bit microcontroller is the right processor for these devices.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).