Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
daleste   3/2/2013 4:13:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Wow, a lose of 451 million dollars. That seems like a lot of money. Maybe I'm just not as rich as Samsung and Apple.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
rick merritt   3/2/2013 4:44:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Wow, a whole new trial on damages is a possibility? An impermissible legal theory found this late in the game? Man, this is going to be one for the books.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
old account Frank Eory   3/2/2013 2:19:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Why did it take so many months for the presiding judge to identify an "impermissible legal theory" on which the damages were based? Rick is right, this is really one for the books.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
Bert22306   3/2/2013 9:39:03 PM
NO RATINGS
What a circus. The minute it was reported that the jury were instructed NOT to consider prior art, if this related to products only sold outside the US, my conclusion was that the trial was tainted. The whole absurd affair should be thrown out. Such a waste of money only the legal profession could love.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
Robotics Developer   3/2/2013 10:42:15 PM
NO RATINGS
When there is that much money, impact, legal precedent and media attention it can't help but be an interesting trial/outcome.. I wonder what the impact on Samsung's products will be, does anyone know what this will result in?

Calcifeyed
User Rank
Rookie
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
Calcifeyed   3/3/2013 3:04:51 PM
NO RATINGS
The article says the fine is $599 billion; if that's true, that's 600 times more!

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
Peter Clarke   3/4/2013 11:45:31 AM
NO RATINGS
@MrMichael Thanks for pointing out the error. I have made the correction in copy.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
selinz   3/4/2013 5:53:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Apparently the jury didn't miscalculate. "Because the court has identified an impermissible legal theory on which the jury based its award, and cannot reasonably calculate the amount of excess while effectuating the intent of the jury..." So the amount of the damages could reasonably go up as well as go down. They fact that she lowered the amount seems not relevant if a new jury is simply going to recalculate.

MarcoPolo13
User Rank
Rookie
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
MarcoPolo13   3/4/2013 8:52:36 PM
NO RATINGS
The legal analysis I read shortly after the close pointed out that the jury had deferred in a large part to one of their members who was in the process of defending his own patents. This fellow said several things about the deliberation to the media only days after the trial all of which violated the judges instructions. One of those rules was for the jury not to seek punitive damages. He said "Samsung should be punished for their infringements".

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
daleste   3/5/2013 2:14:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting. Sabotaged by a juror that wishes for a similar outcome for his own case.

Neo10
User Rank
Rookie
re: Samsung's damage payments to Apple slashed
Neo10   3/5/2013 7:15:41 AM
NO RATINGS
The numbers aside this is a fighters take all market for the lawyers employed from both sides. Let their tribe flourish..



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).