Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>
WHP
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
WHP   3/8/2013 4:46:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Duane, I think everyone has observed that phenomenon but I think you may be the first to actually give it a name. So as far as I'm concerned, Duane's Law it is.

DWilde10
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
DWilde10   3/8/2013 4:43:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Which is why even Intel finally loves Linux on x86, finally, Duane [my opinion, not my employer Intel's]. AFA Moore's law, whether it was ever "true" or not, it sure drove a revolution we've all benefited from. I'm not sure whether Wright's correlation really means a whole lot, it's one of those "yeah, so?"s. Gordon Moore caught the imagination of a generation of engineers, and the rest is history.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Duane Benson   3/8/2013 4:20:19 PM
NO RATINGS
There's also Duane's law, which is corollary to the two-car garage syndrome. Even if not by name, many people are likely familiar with. It states that no matter how large your garage is, the amount of stuff you accumulate will fill it such that there is never more than just less then enough room required to put one car in. That, by inference leads to Duane's law which postulates that no matter what the performance of your computer system, the operating system will lug it down to the point at which it performs at a level just slightly less than the first computer you ever owned. Unfortunately, Duane's law has a tendency negate the effects of Moore's law and presumably the others.

Larry M
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Larry M   3/8/2013 4:15:24 PM
NO RATINGS
To be more precise, John Nash won the Nobel Prize for Economics, not exactly a deterministic or exact science, and only provable by statistical measures. (There is no Nobel Prize for Mathematics.)

Larry M
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Larry M   3/8/2013 4:11:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Fermat's Last Theorem really should have been named Fermat's Last Conjecture.

Comfortable
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Comfortable   3/8/2013 3:01:59 PM
NO RATINGS
A physical law,according to the Oxford English dictionary, is "a theoretical principle deduced from particular facts, applicable to a defined group or class of phenomena, and expressible by the statement that a particular phenomenon always occurs if certain conditions be present." John Nash received a Nobel Prize on game theory with lots of mathematical equations describing how humans interact. As engineers, let's not always look at things so black and white.

CharlieCL
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
CharlieCL   3/8/2013 2:16:11 PM
NO RATINGS
@AntoineB Agree. Moore's Law is not a Law. It is a theory for SC companies to spend money.

AntoineB
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
AntoineB   3/8/2013 9:03:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Moore's law might have been based on observation at first, but it has changed. It is now nothing more than an implicite objective followed by semiconductor companies. They adapt their efforts in order to reach this objective. If Moore's law has been "correct" for so long it is only because SC companies made it correct. I don't think it is of any statistical relevance nowadays.

nastaynas
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
nastaynas   3/8/2013 4:30:17 AM
NO RATINGS
At least Mr. Moore has enjoyed his fame for a while

kenny.g
User Rank
Author
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
kenny.g   3/8/2013 2:19:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Moore's law is not a law,people don't give a shit about it! it is a trend for the company to follow to make money which in this case flawed due to major miscalculation of not taking into account of the whole semiconductor eco-system.

<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...