Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Yet another Law
R_Colin_Johnson   7/9/2013 3:43:36 PM
NO RATINGS
You are a very funny guy. I didn't get it until the very last line. Good one!

waynet2
User Rank
Rookie
Yet another Law
waynet2   7/9/2013 3:36:51 PM
NO RATINGS
While it may have limited applications in our industry, Cole's Law is my preference; it just tastes better. Simply stated, Cole's Law is "Cabbage In = Cabbage Out", with a little special sauce and horseradish.

GLink
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
GLink   4/15/2013 3:29:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd also like to point out that once we hit the physics-based limit on feature scaling, we still have the third dimension to keep us busy for a while, as well as ever-larger chip sizes. The actual Moore's law isn't just about speed, nor feature size - it's about computing power available at the most economic price point, which means that bigger, cheaper chips, still count. Once we hit the physics-limit, the foundries that can hit that will eventually get paid off, and chip prices will decrease, giving us an increase of computing power at a given price point, and thus, giving a bit of new life to the observation for a few more years.

Embedded SW Dev
User Rank
Manager
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Embedded SW Dev   3/17/2013 1:02:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Failure to account for Moore's Law has resulted in a number of projects being prematurely cancelled. Just because a technology does not yield a cost-effective product today, does not mean that the same product won't be cost effective in 2-4 years. Maybe the product needs to be put on the back burner, but way too often I have seen the project to be killed, only to be resurrected by another company a few years later when the costs become attractive.

Steven.Herrrick
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Steven.Herrrick   3/14/2013 6:28:51 AM
NO RATINGS
so he claimed.

peralta_mike
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
peralta_mike   3/13/2013 5:25:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Moore's Law (Trend) is amazing. I have been in the Semiconductor Industry since 1982 and every five years or so (1987, 1993, 1998, 2003, etc. etc.)I hear someone predicting that it will no longer hold -- but it does -- decade after decade.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
DrQuine   3/13/2013 1:15:15 AM
NO RATINGS
I completely agree with "iniewski". Nevertheless, I predict that when computer chips have shrunk to their physical limit and Moore's Law has clearly reached the end of the line, there will be headlines that a "law" has been violated or found invalid. In any case, the longevity of this trend has been remarkable - in part because nobody wants the trend to end on their watch so the R&D efforts are redoubled when the end of the law's reign seems to be coming. The consumers of electronic products are the winners.

Sparky_Watt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Sparky_Watt   3/12/2013 5:44:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Since when is being able to predict the market not thinking like an Engineer? Making decisions by throwing darts is not thinking like and Engineer.

Sparky_Watt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Sparky_Watt   3/12/2013 5:43:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Moore's "Law" describes what is feasible. Its weakness is that there are physical limits to how far it can go.

Sparky_Watt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore's Law trumped by Wright's Law
Sparky_Watt   3/12/2013 5:40:48 PM
NO RATINGS
No, there are actually four types of physical laws: Definitions (e.g. F=ma, which defines the concept of force), Empirical (which is strictly observational), and Theoretical (which embodies an understanding), and derived (which can be mathematically produced from other laws, e.g. torque). Derived laws stand and fall with the laws they are derived from. Theoretical laws apply wherever the understanding they are based on applies. Definitions are true no matter what; the question with definitions is not "are they true" but "are they relevant".

Page 1 / 5   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
Post a comment
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Max Maxfield

Juggling a Cornucopia of Projects
Max Maxfield
6 comments
I feel like I'm juggling a lot of hobby projects at the moment. The problem is that I can't juggle. Actually, that's not strictly true -- I can juggle ten fine china dinner plates, but ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
29 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
128 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

latest comment mhrackin Where's the "empty bin" link?
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)