Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
eewiz   3/19/2013 9:16:32 AM
NO RATINGS
SEO-ing your website?

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
resistion   3/16/2013 1:13:13 PM
NO RATINGS
CMU's name was used in Mean Girls 2 (appropriate?). I wonder how much they were paid for that.

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
green_is_now   3/15/2013 11:59:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Peoples intelectual property should be respected and paid to use. If willfull stealling is proven. Creaters wronged and that took time to ask for payment and blown off should compensated. The stealing party should be forced to pay extra damages also for court cost above infringment amount. Stealing is thievery, period, and needs too be have enforcment means.

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
green_is_now   3/15/2013 11:50:39 AM
NO RATINGS
tO GET TREBLE DAMAGES

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
eewiz   3/15/2013 4:47:01 AM
NO RATINGS
I have glanced through the patents. They are about calculating the branch metric in viterbi decoding. Didnt understand the exact advantage of the proposed system. But having worked in similar areas(Wireless PHY design) I can confidently say, there are atleast a 100 other ways of doing the same thing. Not something very unique IMO. Most of the maths you see in that patent is from textbook and not invented by CMU. http://www.google.com/patents?id=SS8JAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4#v=onepage&q&f=false http://www.google.com/patents?id=KKQLAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

nosubject
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
nosubject   3/14/2013 9:19:25 PM
NO RATINGS
"I suspect the Jury might consist of total idiots". The juries are required to be idiot. They have to be regular people without tech knowledge to cause biases. That is the requirement of the US law system. We can imagine the juries for such patent cases are mostly local old ladies and soccer moms. The keywords are "They should not have any STEM background."

tb1
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
tb1   3/14/2013 7:52:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Lots of knee jerk speeches without much substance here. Has anyone even looked at the patent involved? This isn't some overly broad patent but a very specific patent with detailed mathematical algorithms. Having known someone who claimed that a certain company starting with M partnered with his company then stole all the IP and built it themselves, resulting in many lawsuits he went broke trying to right the wrongs, I wouldn't be so quick to fly off at the handle and make gross generalizations about patents in this case.

dinky
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
dinky   3/14/2013 7:42:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Why is this new only on EET? tried googling, can't find it anywhere else!

Battar
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
Battar   3/14/2013 7:54:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Selinz, wilful infringement means learning a competitors invention and deliberatly copying it, other than plain infringement, which means coming up with a similar idea independently later in the day. Both cases are infringement, of course, but for wilful infringement you can claim triple damages.

asic_pal
User Rank
Author
re: Marvell ordered to pay $1.2 billion in patent case
asic_pal   3/13/2013 9:54:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, I have immediately checked Marvel stock when I last saw the news, there was no reaction in the stock market! I think common investors may not even knew about this case or don't care about it. I think the only law suits people care about is from Apple :)

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
VicVat
 
jnissen
 
M_Alex_Nugent
 
traneus
 
David Ashton
 
perl_geek
 
Max The Magnificent
 
perl_geek
Most Recent Messages
2/9/2016
1:17:21 AM
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...