Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
amacon
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
amacon   3/22/2013 6:08:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Years ago, I wrote a program that my family reunion use a computer to identify their relationship to other people at a reunion. One of the things I realized that made this program much simpler was that one's siblings were one's 0th cousins.

alunh_1
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
alunh_1   3/22/2013 12:43:35 PM
NO RATINGS
If you want a complete and detailed explaination try: http://www.genetic-genealogy.co.uk/ My father-inlaw is something of an expert in these things.

rpell2
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
rpell2   3/20/2013 1:29:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Wikipedia has a cousin relationship chart that I've found useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin#Cousin_chart

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
Max The Magnificent   3/20/2013 8:06:38 AM
NO RATINGS
You make is sound so simple, especially if you say it quickly :-) But seriously, I do like your suggestion: When they talk about each other X would say "Y is my n th cousin r times removed". Y would say "I am n th cousin r times removed to X".

Steam Kid
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
Steam Kid   3/19/2013 3:59:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Not as difficult as you are making it sound. If you have a common ancestor Z with children X & Y producing a generational column of ancestors then the children of X & Y are cousins. I imagine no-one has problems understanding this. To illustrate it graphically, imagine a three column strip with the first column labelled as n, second column as X ancestral line & the third column as Y ancestral line. Thus label Z as n=-1, X & Y as n=0, then the (first)cousins are n=+1. For each generation down n increments and you have the n th cousin of X & Y. When you stop going down the X column but continue down the Y column r times then you have the n th cousin r times removed. When they talk about each other X would say "Y is my n th cousin r times removed". Y would say "I am n th cousin r times removed to X". thus no ambiguity.

adkozin
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
adkozin   3/19/2013 3:54:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Try reading Heinlien's "All You Zombies" Makes Ray Stevens simple by comparason.

Barton.Meeks
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
Barton.Meeks   3/19/2013 3:48:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Correction for Xth cousin: number of generations back minus one. For 2nd cousins, you go back 3 generations to find the common ancestor, a great-grandparent.

Barton.Meeks
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
Barton.Meeks   3/19/2013 3:32:35 PM
NO RATINGS
The Xth cousin part is how many generations you have to go back to find a common ancestor. The Yth removed part is how many "levels" you are off. Example: Chip is my 1st cousin once removed. His mother and I are first cousins, we have a common grandparent. Chip and I are "once removed" because it is two levels back to the common ancestor for me, but three levels back for him. Look up cousin on wikipedia -- they have pictures!

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
Max The Magnificent   3/19/2013 8:44:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Hmmm -- it would seem that it must be commutative -- but that can make it a bit "lop-sided". So if you are the first cousin to some one, and they have a kid and that kid has a kid, then the kid's kid is your first cousin twice removed. But similarly, you are that kid's kid's first cousin twice removed. My head hurts...

ChrisJ555
User Rank
Author
re: Are you my third cousin twice removed?
ChrisJ555   3/18/2013 4:06:37 PM
NO RATINGS
So the answer didn't say explicitly, but I assume that the "x times removed" is commutative? In other words, I am the first cousin once removed of my mom's cousin....so she is my first cousin once removed also, right?

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

As we unveil EE Times’ 2015 Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. Panelists Dan Armbrust (investment firm Silicon Catalyst), Andrew Kau (venture capital firm Walden International), and Stan Boland (successful serial entrepreneur, former CEO of Neul, Icera) join in the live debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...