Probably the simplest similar adapter would have been a piece of insulation from a chunk of number fourteen copper house-wiring cable. From each foot of wire you could produce about 36 of the 3/8 inch long adapters, and at about 90 cents a foot for the two conductor cable it would have been quite cheap. But those spacers are a more elegant way to do it.
I thought of making a powered propeller hat a few years ago. I wanted the propeller to turn slowly enough to be able to see the blades (2 or 3 revolutions per second or so). I programmed a PIC to PWM the motor, but I found that there were a bunch of things that affected the speed (temperature, humidity, battery voltage...) and since I was trying to run at the hairy edge, it just didn't work very well.
This must be a magic adapter. The ID and OD are the same.
A long time ago I designed a fabricated part. The machinist insisted there was a dimension problem, I of course insisted it was correct. He later came in with a handful of metal shavings.
"Here's your part" I learned my lesson.
Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.