Breaking News
Comments
betajet
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: A clock
betajet   3/22/2013 6:19:59 PM
NO RATINGS
The spirit of Rube Goldberg lives on! Actually, the French did something like this during the Revolution: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time It didn't catch on and they went back to HMS.

Wnderer
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: A clock
Wnderer   3/24/2013 3:29:34 PM
Mine's better. Base 2 time. Divide the 365.256 day year into exactly 1024 time periods. I call these thirddays because they are about a third of a day long. 8.56 hours. Now we divide the third days into 8 new type hours and each hours into 64 minutes and each minute into 64 seconds.Each of these new seconds is 0.94 old seconds long. We can also now have sixteen 64 thirdday months. Now we can handle time calculations with just bit shifts. 6 bits are seconds. 6 bits are minutes. 3 bits are hours. 6 bits are days. 4 bits are months. And the rest are years. In practice, Work one thirdday and take two thirddays off. Work one thirdday and take two thirddays off. Work one thirdday and take seven thirddays off. Repeat. This equates to the current 24 hour time as working 3 days out of 5 and starting work an hour and a half later everyday. For example start work at 7:00AM one day, 8:34AM the next and 10:07AM the third and then take two days off and repeat. When do I get my patent?

Tloose
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
Tloose   3/25/2013 3:25:11 PM
NO RATINGS
You just publicly disclosed your 'invention' so - never!

Frank Wiedmann
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
Frank Wiedmann   3/25/2013 3:25:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Another recent attempt at this was Swatch Internet Time (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time ).

BobsView
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: A clock
BobsView   3/25/2013 3:42:02 PM
NO RATINGS
I have always thought Base 16 makes more sense for everything. The Decimal System is a poorly devised system, yet everyone promotes it like it was divinely inspired. I like Base 16 because it is divisible by 2 down to a singularity, or 1. You can't do that with Base 10. 10 divided by 2 is 5. 5 divided by 2 is 2.5 and so on. Thus we enter the realm of decimals where it get messy. So my vote goes for 16 Hours/day, 16 minutes/hour, 16 seconds/minute. Thus a clock face would be divided into 16 parts. Under the current system of time, when we say it's 3:15, the hour hand points to the 3, but the minute hand also points to the 3. It doesn't point to the 15. Makes no sense to me. I think we can do better.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: A clock
Duane Benson   3/25/2013 8:37:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Reminds me of a children's book I read when I was back in first grade, "Ramona the Pest". In one passage, she showed up ten minutes late for school. Class started at quarter after eight. A quarter coin is 25 cents. Therefore, quarter past the hour must be 8:25. It is a rather silly system, but very many of our systems have a lot of silliness in them. Now here's one: Lat/Lon time. Instead of timezones, our time keeping devices will automatically compensate for our exact location on Earth. Since almost no one likes to talk anymore, it would be easy for our text messaging, email and any other communication system to translate so each party would see the time with their respective compensation.

GSKrasle
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: A clock
GSKrasle   3/26/2013 4:00:51 PM
NO RATINGS
It reminds me of Randall Munroe's "28 hour day": http://xkcd.com/320/ Caveat: "this schedule will eventually drive one strk raving mad."

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: A clock
DrQuine   3/26/2013 10:39:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Ben Franklin improved the clock hundreds of years ago (and I have a modern replica to illustrate it). His assumption was that a clock could have one hand which made a rotation every 8 hours. Just as we take it for granted that we know whether it is 1 am or 1 pm (12 hour steps), he assumed that an observer can estimate the time within 8 hours. On such a clock, the minutes can be interpolated with sufficient accuracy for most human purposes.

mhrackin
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: A clock
mhrackin   3/27/2013 8:18:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Why not just skip all of the pseudo-binary-based proposals and go straight binary? A simple example: a system of volumetric units. One tablespoon x2= 1 ounce x2 = 1 dounce x2= 1 tounce x2 = 1 hup x2= 1 cup x2= 1 pint x2= 1 quart x2= 1 hallon x2= 1 gallon etc. The English system finally gets its revenge over metrification!

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: A clock
BrianBailey   3/29/2013 2:21:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Love it!

WayneP3
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
WayneP3   3/29/2013 7:01:33 PM
NO RATINGS
What remains at issue is that our days and years do not match. The Earth rotates 365.256 times relative to the Sun per orbit. Any new system will have to account for this offset

PizzaEater
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
PizzaEater   3/29/2013 8:06:03 PM
NO RATINGS
When I was in college I invented the metric week. 10 days long. I figured a 3 day weekend and 7 day work week would give me 30% off a week instead of the current 28.6%.

bogdanbmcc
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
bogdanbmcc   4/2/2013 2:27:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Another proof that patents are evil!

Anonymouse1234567891011121314151617181920
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
Anonymouse1234567891011121314151617181920   4/3/2013 8:32:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Stardate -310253.94 ... BAZINGA!

Sparky_Watt
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: A clock
Sparky_Watt   4/16/2013 6:00:53 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't know why he picked 36. 12 is also divisible by 2, 3, and 4. 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6!

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
??
kfield   9/20/2013 3:56:00 PM
NO RATINGS
And this clock format is better how?

marknowotarski
User Rank
Rookie
Patent has issued
marknowotarski   9/21/2013 8:42:14 PM
NO RATINGS
For the record, this is actually an issued patent.  https://www.google.com/patents/US8379489

 

That means the inventor has exclusivity for about 20 years.

marknowotarski
User Rank
Rookie
One year to file
marknowotarski   9/21/2013 9:13:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Video Comment




Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Vetinari Clock: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions …
Max Maxfield
24 comments
Things are bouncing merrily along with regard to my uber-cool Vetinari Clock project. The wooden cabinet is being handcrafted by my chum Bob (a master carpenter) using an amazing ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...