Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple-Samsung duopoly: Great for consumers, lousy for business
Duane Benson   3/31/2013 12:06:40 AM
NO RATINGS
The difference between Coke and Pepsi and Apple and Samsung is that a technology misstep can have a pretty major impact pretty fast. Motorola (twice, I think) had the top spot in mobile phones. Nokia has, as stated, fallen far. In the CPU world, AMD has dropped a lot lately and may end up being nosed out by Arm. Either Apple of Samsung or both could easily stumble and end up way down in the pack.

IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple-Samsung duopoly: Great for consumers, lousy for business
IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc   3/28/2013 5:57:48 PM
NO RATINGS
You're either with apple, or you're with the terrorists. There is no room in a CIVILIZED society for binary thinking. Only the weak of mind would limit themselves to two choices without considering the wealth of other possibilities. Thankfully, products evolve and marketplaces shift to allow real competition to flourish. As mentioned in the article, ARM is the prime example of a third option disrupting the status quo. A duopoly worries too much about market share and less about what the customer really needs. Once this happens it paves the way for third parties to swoop in and make the old ones obsolete ... on that note, I guess I just predicted the impending downfall of apple and samsung.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple-Samsung duopoly: Great for consumers, lousy for business
DrQuine   3/26/2013 9:55:42 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd call it a dynamic marketplace. First, there was just one smart phone provider: Blackberry (and Palm Pilot if you needed a smart personal digital assistant and could get by without a telephone). Now both of them are swept to the side and we have a head to heat competition of smart phone providers. Is the "Innovator's Dilemma" playing out as we move from one provider to the next?

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple-Samsung duopoly: Great for consumers, lousy for business
Bert22306   3/26/2013 8:38:58 PM
NO RATINGS
No reason to fret, Brian. All industries go through this consolidation as they mature, but the much dreaded dupopolies have a way of being themselves at high risk. Look at the auto industry, as an obvious and recent example. In the US, the duopoly became GM and Ford. And yet GM at least, and Ford could have been there but squeaked by, just about went bankrupt. Seemed practically impossible. The smartphone industry is a fashion industry. Fashion is fickle. Things can easily change from one year to the next.



Most Recent Comments
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Creating a Vetinari Clock Using Antique Analog Meters
Max Maxfield
55 comments
As you may recall, the Mighty Hamster (a.k.a. Mike Field) graced my humble office with a visit a couple of weeks ago. (See All Hail the Mighty Hamster.) While he was here, Hamster noticed ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)