Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
chanj0
User Rank
Manager
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
chanj0   4/23/2013 7:20:03 AM
NO RATINGS
When it comes to small and low cost, single chip solution is the key. If you can have one chip to equip with all required features, why using more? Question is whether Intel has enough talent to push everything into a single chip while maintaining the power consumption to be low.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
resistion   4/22/2013 2:41:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Didn't Intel already have three phone deals? Is the cost already listed?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
resistion   4/22/2013 1:57:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I know MSFT employees use Win8 (ask one), and should we be surprised.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
selinz   4/21/2013 7:06:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Interestingly, I don't yet know 1 person with Windows 8. No compelling reason to "upgrade" apparently... I only know one person with a windows phone (I was a windows phone holdout through 6.5) Their timing has been bad.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
Bert22306   4/20/2013 9:02:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I see contradictions in this analysis, though. Mainly the bit about integration. It wasn't long ago that we were being told how Intel had it all wrong, because they WERE developing integrated chips, and low cost smart phones wanted non-integrated solutions, so they could mix and match. So which is it? Also, I've been seeing a lot of ads about the Surface Pro lately, so it looks to me like Intel is focusing on tablets, no? I've no reason to believe the Surface Pro is the end of Intel's interest in tablets? And also, if the market for cheap smartphones is booming, and the market for expensive smartphones is stagnating, then why wouldn't that bode ill for Apple as well? Dunno. I get the impression that some pessimism sells better than other pessimism, logic be damned?

Les_Slater
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
Les_Slater   4/20/2013 1:59:15 PM
NO RATINGS
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-57580376-92/cheap-intel-devices-will-run-google-microsoft-oses-sources-say/

Les_Slater
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
Les_Slater   4/19/2013 10:05:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I think Rick is generally correct in his article, the market shifting to low end bodes ill for Intel, at least as far as the smartphone goes. Don't think Intel will target the low end but get what they can of the higher end. Intel has to make a strong stand on the tablet side of the mobile market, that's where personal electronic devices are eating their PC base. There LTE integration is not so important. What Intel faces is price pressure in the tablet arena. They need an SoC strategy where as much of the chip part of the BOM is in their silicon, or at least in their multi-die package. I can see them having to be able to sell that for a hundred bucks in a low end variant.

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
alex_m1   4/19/2013 4:31:09 PM
NO RATINGS
One guess about this talks about integrated solution(including LTE), on a 14nm process, coming in 2014 and beating the competition also on power consumption of the modem. It fits with intel's remarks about 14nm in 2014 , and a separate remark about lte integration in 2014. So we'll just have to wait and see.

help.fulguy
User Rank
Manager
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
help.fulguy   4/19/2013 3:53:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Trash of an article. What else can you expect when you have ARM funded UBM write articles against Intel. On top of it, by this bozo of an article writer.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Cheap smartphone boom bodes ill for Intel
Robotics Developer   4/19/2013 12:11:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Given history and consumer purchasing wants (not needs but wants) I would have to say the company that provides the lowest cost end product with reasonable performance and a good feature set would be well positioned for future sales. I know that there are many who just have to have the latest/fastest/who cares at what price device but the volume business is in the lower cost fuller featured smartphone market. We don't want to give up features but do want them for lower cost. Time will tell if Intel or the competition will win out..

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Fist Bumps & the Zombie Apocalypse
Max Maxfield
23 comments
Are you concerned about the possibility of a Zombie Apocalypse or do you scoff at the thought of such an eventuality? If the latter, would you be surprised to hear that the US military has ...

Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
8 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
41 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
151 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)