Not particularly impressive, considering acam of Germany's TDC-GP22 and -GPX chips, which get down to mm accuracy (sub 30 ps). And they're cheap ($20 ish). TDC is straight LIDAR; the chief advantages of UWB are noise immunity and non-line-of-sight use. Time Domain also compete here on UWB, but they are pricey ($2K per Tx/Rx).
Ever since ill-fated IEEE802.15.3a UWB fiasco, I've been fascinated with possibility of the pure impulse radio. It is glad to hear there are people still exploring this technology.
By the way isn't "IR" short for Impulse Radio could be confusing with InfraRed?
A few cm accuracy at 880 metres with UWB IR is close to 2 orders of magnitude improvement on the previous state-of-the-art. Saying it is not novel/surprising is like saying that a GHz pentium running at 70mW is not novel or surprising.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.