Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
Les_Slater
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
Les_Slater   4/23/2013 6:04:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Chip's comments illustrate a couple points I've been trying to make. One is that the question is outside just engineering decisions, it involves economics and ITS LAWS. And these laws defy national boundaries. Also his remarks display a certain desperate helplessness. All 'must' do this, that or the other thing. Says who? Nobody's in control. It's Smith's 'Invisible Hand' gone amok.

chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
chipmonk0   4/23/2013 5:21:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Japan has pretty much lost the huge Consumer Electronics market in the US & W. Europe to So. Korea, Taiwan and China. If unlike Europe, Japan does not want to let go of this low margin but high volume segment, then they have to compete with So. Korea in terms of NPI, with China on the basis of price. The article mentioned something about sticking to 20 year reliability even for DRAM for throwaway Consumer products ! Thats a no no ! The Japanese must re-examine all their assumptions and quickly change course accordingly. This means faster development cycles ( more science & simulation and fewer experiments ), more robotics ( even if it causes more unemployment among factory workers - at least there will be more money from exports to retrain them in something else ). Otherwise I am afraid it would be 1945 all over again. I say this as a well wisher who has managed semiconductor projects in Japan.

pradipk
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
pradipk   4/23/2013 4:05:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with you on the workaholic part..also their culture of giving over respect and following their boss without questioning or expressing individual views

Les_Slater
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
Les_Slater   4/23/2013 1:50:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Being a free agent can only be an illusion. Smith's 'invisible hand' has more to do with our actions than most would suspect.

cd2012
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
cd2012   4/23/2013 11:46:47 AM
NO RATINGS
While I agree that engineers might and should see themselves as free agents, reality in the semiconductor industry is that they will work for a mid-size to large company. The economics of making chips do not lend themselves to true free agency, i.e., being a consultant for one's own firm. Please let me know how I'm wrong on this b/c I'd love to throw up my own shingle.

scud
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
scud   4/23/2013 8:59:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Probably a dumb thing to say, but was there any discussion about the "overwork" culture in Japan? Having visited there a few times, I could never come to terms that tired Japanese engineers were staying in office, day after day, not going home, rarely spending time with their families - at times simply because their bosses were at office. On an individual level, can not such pressure sap the mind of creating innovative ideas and the pleasure of working on technology?

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
Bert22306   4/22/2013 7:45:30 PM
NO RATINGS
I was most interested in reading about how Japanese engineers identify themselves with a company, in which they fully expected to devote their entire careers. So even that, like the rest of the topics covered, strikes me as something that the US and European electronics industries have already gone through. My own "paradigm shift" when this was going on was that engineers now, in the US, are seen by their fellow engineers much more like free agents. It's your name and your reputation that matters most and that precedes you, not so much the company you happen to work for today. I remember at the start of my career, that a more seasoned engineer told me, "You don't owe any loyalty to the company." It sounded a bit harsh at the time, but with the big layoffs in the early to mid 1990s, I could see exactly what he meant. You owe loyalty to yourself first and foremost. The company can and will lay you off at the drop of a hat, if the bottom line doesn't add up right.

Les_Slater
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
Les_Slater   4/22/2013 7:17:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I worked as a Principal Engineer in the late 80's through the early 90's at a fairly large company that rather quickly went from the industry's darling to a hopeless basket case. That was Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC). I learned and gained experience from looking at projects from a systems perspective. After DEC failed to perform to expectations and then evaporated, I looked at that experience too, from a systems perspective. It's on a bigger scale but I believe also that the performance of a national industry must also be seen as part of a bigger system. The article here referenced decisions by government agencies including banks. The article raised organization, vertical as opposed distributed, etc.

Daniel Cooley
User Rank
Author
re: Japanese electronics industry debates future amid turmoil
Daniel Cooley   4/22/2013 6:31:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Fantastic article. The lessons here can be applied in a much broader context.

<<   <   Page 4 / 4


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...