Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
resistion   5/2/2013 8:39:45 AM
NO RATINGS
All of Intel's foundry cases are 22 nm, gaining more of them could risk scuttling Intel's own 22 nm ramp.

skywoo
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
skywoo   5/2/2013 12:56:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel selling make believe. Market will soon see Intel's 22 nanometer is anti-competitive on with Taiwan foundry 28 nanometer. Taiwan 28 nanometer Tesmash A6-1450 wins GPU/CPU power/performance against intel's 22 nanometer Baytrail-T. Current Intel CEO already sees the Tesmash design wins (MS Surface, HP, Acer and he thinks even Apple (but not 100% sure).

geekmaster
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
geekmaster   5/2/2013 7:20:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Looks like Intel becomes more of a foundry. I wonder if they have a dedicated fab for that and which one is it?

flowcontrol
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
flowcontrol   5/2/2013 8:32:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Most likely Fab42

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
resistion   5/2/2013 10:04:02 PM
NO RATINGS
22 nm foundry volume doesn't seem negligible yet when will they stop taking orders.

Chipguy1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
Chipguy1   5/3/2013 12:52:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I think intel would be better off if they spent time, effort and money building capacity for Intel branded market leading products then being a contract manufacturer with much lower margins.

any1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
any1   5/3/2013 1:19:07 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems like the current Intel plan is to do both. Maybe they see it as a good way to leverage their R&D and capital outlays as well as a strategy to balance/utilize fab capacity.

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
double-o-nothing   5/3/2013 1:21:54 AM
NO RATINGS
It could be an admission by Intel that they can no longer find plentiful OEM customers for their chips. In the SoC era, just being excellent in the CPU is not enough.

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
the_floating_ gate   5/3/2013 4:12:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel as well as AMD used trailing /depreciated capacity to make NOR flash . AMD spun off Spansion and I believe Intel sold NOR to MU. No reason why Intel can not apply this strategy to the foundry biz - Intel already has mature yields on 22nm TriGate while TSMC et al are scrambling to provide their FinFet solutions to market. My guess is there will an Intel foundry business unit emerging that will be focused on winning NON ARM foundry business - business that won't compromise Intel's core business

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
resistion   5/3/2013 1:39:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Suppose I were a fabless but I preferred to wait on the new 22 nm technology. Could Intel do 32 nm or 45 nm for me?

seaEE
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
seaEE   5/4/2013 3:42:29 AM
NO RATINGS
If someone had asked who the next company Intel would be building 22nm chips for, I never would have guessed Microsemi.

alex_m1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
alex_m1   5/4/2013 9:32:39 AM
NO RATINGS
@resistion: i'm not sure intel is competitive at lower nodes(or else it would have offered them by now). But if intel does find a way to compete at older nodes, it could really hurt tsmc who made most of revenues/profits from older nodes.

Kresearch
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
Kresearch   5/5/2013 10:44:52 PM
NO RATINGS
IDM based Foundry usually leave concerns to customers(could be competitors also). For Intel, there is IP conflict ahead. It also would take a while for Intel to fit into customers' specific requests or customers fit into Intel's specific offerings.

joshxdr
User Rank
Author
re: Intel to make 22-nm chips for Microsemi
joshxdr   5/5/2013 11:29:47 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe the author said "defer the cost" when he meant "defray"



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...