Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 7   >   >>
sranje
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
sranje   5/25/2013 11:39:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Krzanich and Intel will continue to do very well -- Croatians rock !!

sranje
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
sranje   5/25/2013 11:39:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Krzanich and Intel will continue to do very well -- Croatians rock !!

GroovyGeek
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
GroovyGeek   5/7/2013 6:12:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Barrett was an engineer with broad experience in operations. He was the guy that invented copy exactly and is personally responsible for Intel becoming the manufacturing powerhouse it currently is. However there is reason to argue that Barrett was the worst CEO in Intel's history. More than $20B blown on acquisitions, mostly in cash, at the top of the market, and mostly written off. I cannot think of a single company that has not been either sold at a substantial loss or shut down. Intel knows how to execute, this is not their problem, they are the best in the world at it. Intel needs something to execute on to diversify their business, and operations wizards typically do not excel in that department. Let's give BK the benefit of the doubt, he just does not seem to have the background. ONE patent, no active visibility in the industry outside Intel... Time will tell.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
GroovyGeek   5/7/2013 6:12:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Barrett was an engineer with broad experience in operations. He was the guy that invented copy exactly and is personally responsible for Intel becoming the manufacturing powerhouse it currently is. However there is reason to argue that Barrett was the worst CEO in Intel's history. More than $20B blown on acquisitions, mostly in cash, at the top of the market, and mostly written off. I cannot think of a single company that has not been either sold at a substantial loss or shut down. Intel knows how to execute, this is not their problem, they are the best in the world at it. Intel needs something to execute on to diversify their business, and operations wizards typically do not excel in that department. Let's give BK the benefit of the doubt, he just does not seem to have the background. ONE patent, no active visibility in the industry outside Intel... Time will tell.

Chuck052
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
Chuck052   5/7/2013 2:36:22 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a perfect choice - an engineer with broad experience in operations. I would expect much clearer direction and commitment to execution than we've seen in a very long time. Kick ass Brian.

Chuck052
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
Chuck052   5/7/2013 2:36:22 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a perfect choice - an engineer with broad experience in operations. I would expect much clearer direction and commitment to execution than we've seen in a very long time. Kick ass Brian.

fourfaith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
fourfaith   5/7/2013 6:57:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters.

fourfaith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
fourfaith   5/7/2013 6:57:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
daleste   5/4/2013 3:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
The comments are interesting. I think it is usually best to promote from within unless the company really needs a big change in direction. I don't think Intel is a company that needs a big change in direction. As the largest semiconductor company in the world, their task is to maintain momentum. Incremental improvements will beat huge changes. I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters. If you let the finance guys run the company, you will make a lot of money for a short time.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
daleste   5/4/2013 3:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
The comments are interesting. I think it is usually best to promote from within unless the company really needs a big change in direction. I don't think Intel is a company that needs a big change in direction. As the largest semiconductor company in the world, their task is to maintain momentum. Incremental improvements will beat huge changes. I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters. If you let the finance guys run the company, you will make a lot of money for a short time.

Page 1 / 7   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
8 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).