Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Youself
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Youself   5/11/2013 4:11:09 PM
NO RATINGS
same comment... MIPS/mW is one metric, but also $/MIPS ... we haven't heard whether this is a $20 or $100 device...

rfab
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
rfab   5/10/2013 8:38:59 AM
NO RATINGS
IS YOU'RE AMD PR OR Mental illness ,Nonsense here all the day?

Chipguy1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Chipguy1   5/10/2013 12:42:43 AM
NO RATINGS
I am not guessing. Silvermount has ivy bridge graphics... (Big Si area) ...and Atom core with out of order execution ( significantly bloats x86 core size.) We have look at this for smartphone application....I am telling you with certainty that silvermount is NOT going to ship in smartphones at any volume due to cost. This is simple Intel marketing at it's finest....marketing leadership performance but using a lot of silicon area so its not apples to apples benchmarking

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Wilco1   5/9/2013 9:16:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Or ask how many Atoms were sold. Intel had 0.2% of the mobile market in Q3'12.

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Wilco1   5/9/2013 9:11:29 PM
NO RATINGS
He has a point though, even the current Atom has a much larger die size than its competitors: http://chip-architect.com/news/2013_core_sizes_768.jpg This is why there are 4, 5 and even 8-core ARMs but only dual Atoms.

Bruzzer
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Bruzzer   5/9/2013 5:30:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Considering this subsidy example further Ivy E3 at 26/22 nm RISK production cost is approximately $0.53 mm2 on average marginal cost of $88, average marginal revenue $196, average weighed Price $279 (range $189 to $884). So some E3v2’s earn a much higher margin then ATOM does today. In this example the average marginal cost of producing one additional E3v2 redirected to ATOM now delivers five 62 mm2 devices at fabrication cost of $15.95 each that is $0.26 mm2 at run end. If those 5 processors fetch $55.50 each can deliver the equivalent of one E3’s average margin in this $197 marginal revenue displacement. The key question then is Intel’s variable cost of production, the general administrative and manpower charge to produce a single microprocessor, or in this general example the system component solution, which on Intel’s financial is around $105. Here raises the price below variable cost query. Mike Bruzzone, Camp Marketing

ElishaMemoryVentures
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
ElishaMemoryVentures   5/9/2013 5:01:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Financial info like this from Bruzzer is too complex for me. But I do believe the issue is not about performance but cost. As mentioned before: Ask Intel the die size. Intel typically has to be one generation ahead to have same die size. very expensive Ask Intel about margins.... actually you can deduce them from the 10Q for the group that runs Atom.

Simon7382
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Simon7382   5/9/2013 4:36:33 AM
NO RATINGS
If these numbers have anything to do with reality then they are confidential information. Hence, either this is all guess BS, or you are violating your NDA with Intel (which they do not look at kindly, and rightfully so). My guess is that you know nothing and made up these numbers.

Simon7382
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Simon7382   5/9/2013 4:30:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Let's wait and see the die size when it is out instead of guessing, shall we?

Simon7382
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Simon7382   5/9/2013 4:29:00 AM
NO RATINGS
You know, Intel has been in the chip business for 40+ years, so one must assume that they understand basics like die size, die cost, gross margin, etc. If I was ARM or TSMC I would be very worried. Intel (not unlike the US) is slow, and certainly does not do the right thing many times, but when it starts moving you better get out of the way.

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
7 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)