Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
dcblaza
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
dcblaza   5/7/2013 3:56:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Watching Intel move towards ARM is like the movement of tectonic plates, painfully slow but there will be an earthquake at some point

PCor
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
PCor   5/7/2013 7:23:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Price v Performance ? Can Intel compete ?

Ironknight
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Ironknight   5/7/2013 10:23:01 AM
NO RATINGS
The only thing Intel has not mentioned about is the price. Once that's also competitive, ARM has no way.

Loek.Frederiks_#2
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Loek.Frederiks_#2   5/7/2013 11:29:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Except that you might wonder if the mobile industry is waiting for a giant like Intel with the same tactics as the PC industry to step in. Remember that the mobile market is somewhat vertically integrated (Apple, Samsung) and at the bottom you have the low-cost players like Mediatek. Probably the company to loose the most is Qualcomm.

Chipguy1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Chipguy1   5/7/2013 1:08:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Ask intel about silvermount die size. Word on street is die size is not competitive and hence silvermont is not competitive on cost and will have little impact on smartphone and tablet market. Ask intel what was the die size of the silvermount chip vs the die size of the parts intel benchmarked against. About 2X larger die size for intel !!! I can't believe market falls for intel marketing hook line and sinker. Just look at last years intel marketing claims on how great ivy bridge was going to be for power using "revolutionary process technology". Claims were ivy bridge would reduce Operational power by 50% and leakage power by 10x and we got 0 (no improvement) for both Mark my word. When market sees silvermount die size ... " market will realize intel process technology is not so "revolutionary"

D-FlipFlop
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
D-FlipFlop   5/7/2013 2:09:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Do you work for ARM by chance? :)

Chipguy1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
Chipguy1   5/7/2013 4:28:58 PM
NO RATINGS
cheap shot Look what is all ready known. Silvermount has design port of a Ivy bridge GPU plus 4 fat X86 cores. With above you can estimate die size. No way that can have a die size to be competitive in a smartphone. on top of that it does not have integrated baseband. All I am suggesting is to benchmark die size. It will soon be clear Intel's "revolutionary manufacturing" is not competitive for smartphone market

US Made
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
US Made   5/7/2013 4:40:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Dadi knows very well. End of the day we know how much Silvermont has captured in cell phone markets. Following Intel style... Measurable Goals....

pica0
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
pica0   5/7/2013 5:38:37 PM
NO RATINGS
deja vu? How many times Intel announced something superior, just to make customers wait and not buy a product of a competing company? How many times Intel manipulated benchmarks? Look at the facts: * Intel does not name the competitors (neither Architecture, nor process, nor maker) * Intel does not explicitly stated, what has been compared (did they compare the power consumption of a mere core to a complete ARM SoC) As soon as mobilephones / tablets using that Silvermont SoC are available for everyone, we can try these gadgets ourselves and then know how these perform.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Intel unveils Silvermont SoC microarchitecture
mcgrathdylan   5/7/2013 6:35:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Check out the analysis of Silvermont posted by David Kanter of Real World Tech. http://www.realworldtech.com/silvermont/

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...