Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Stuart2121
User Rank
Author
DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
Stuart2121   7/3/2013 2:07:33 PM
NO RATINGS
INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL 

I invented a CPU cooler - 3 times better than best - better than water. Intel have major CPU cooling problems - "Intel's microprocessors were generating so much heat that they were melting" (iht.com) - try to talk to them - they send my communications to my competitor & will not talk to me.

Winners of major 'Corporate Social Responsibility' awardS!!!

Huh!!!!

When did RICO get repealed?"

INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!

BTW, I have the evidence - my competitor gave it to me.

BBTW, I am prepared to apologise to Intel if; 

• They can show that the actions were those of a single individual in the company, acting outside corporate policy, and:

• They gain redress on my behalf.

Inventors - help your fellow inventors - share your experiences with companies - good and bad.

Stuart Saunders,

Intellectual Property Rightful Owners Action Group

reform at iproag dot org

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
resistion   5/29/2013 12:55:57 AM
NO RATINGS
Is it implied Intel 10nm process already frozen?

swylai
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
swylai   5/28/2013 4:59:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Aside from manufacturing breakthrough, much can be done in design and application areas. There are opportunities but there are lots of challenges, especially in the scale large enough for Intel. In addition to high volume applications, Intol may be benefited to develop low volume high value areas.

Neo10
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
Neo10   5/27/2013 6:11:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Hmm, they will do well but their limitation is they cannot think beyond silicon, which is past it's peak as fuel for general computing.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
GroovyGeek   5/25/2013 6:27:02 AM
NO RATINGS
You know a lot less than you think you do. I do agree that most talks from Intel are scant on details, but you have to look at their track record. Unlike IBM they don't systematically over-promise and under-deliver. Sure, there is a miss here and there, but rarely anything serious. I suspect that the Atom issue has more to do with design than manufacturing. And Mayberry was talking about the manufacturing side. The recent gutting of IAG senior management suggests the same thing.

Thesoiguro
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
Thesoiguro   5/23/2013 9:10:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I saw the Intel talk. As usually no useful information was given...just a lot of hot air "Mayberry said that everything up to the 10-nm CMOS node – which is in development at Intel and will ramp production in 2015 - is effectively done." give me a break. Intel cant even get 22nm atom parts to work before Q4 or early 2012

ip2design
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
ip2design   5/23/2013 7:12:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Risk and return, as usual.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: More varied research needed beyond 10-nm, says Intel
selinz   5/23/2013 3:51:09 AM
NO RATINGS
The last statement flies in the face of today's stock holder, who wants short term performance. It takes a cash cow(s) to be able to fund research in today's climate. The X86 has done that for Intel. How long will that continue?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...