Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>
joshxdr
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
joshxdr   5/24/2013 12:43:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I have seen a few presentations on quantum computing. In theory, this could replace CMOS and bring a whole new revolution to computing. Or it could be a big fat nothing like high temp superconductors and magnetic memory. It will probably be ten years before they know which one it will be.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
rick merritt   5/24/2013 3:06:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Graphene, anyone?

ozindfw
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
ozindfw   5/24/2013 3:26:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I've no doubt that Samueli's right as far as he goes, but current CMOS tech is not the only option. Similar predictions were made in the early 80's on the basis of optical mask limits. There have been doomsayers about Moore's Law since the day it was formulated. They'll be right when the **investment** in scaling stops, and I don't think anyone sees that happening soon. It wasn't too long ago that "64K of RAM is enough for any application" (and no, it wasn't Bill G. who said it in any form.) Now 64 GB of RAM is an option. 6 orders of magnitude in about 20 years...

lcovey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
lcovey   5/24/2013 3:26:45 PM
NO RATINGS
And there it is, the 20th annual prediction of the end of Moore's Law. DAC must be close.

mhrackin
User Rank
CEO
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
mhrackin   5/24/2013 3:29:11 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember way way back when the "pundits" were talking about "hitting the wall" with the new 16Kbit RAMs (because of error rates)! The ultimate limit for current technology IS approaching this time, BUT the emphasis is on CURRENT. The limit would be at one bit in a single electron, although even that could (a la latest flash etch) be worked around somewhat with multi-level techniques. That would get close to the Heisenberg limit pretty quickly. As others above have pointed out, there are non-electronic techniques (I'm sure not everything under the sun hasn't already been invented) that will have their own limits, but they may be orders of magnitude better than today's bleeding edge. There WILL be an ultimate limit (think about applying Shannon's theorem here). There also seems to be some confusion here between bandwidth and channel speed vs. geometric limits. That's applying the limitations of CURRENT tech and architectures to technologies unknown!

rfic_dog
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
rfic_dog   5/24/2013 3:40:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I think your viewpoint is to human-centric. Yes, at some point there will be enough bandwidth to satisfy all my possible entertainment desires, but (even today) machine-to-machine bandwidth use is growing beyond that used by people. What do machines have to talk about that requires petabits? I have no idea.

JeffL_2
User Rank
CEO
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
JeffL_2   5/24/2013 3:48:01 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to wonder why we have to have processors with eight cores when (other than AMP which actually works so no one will apply it) we don't really know how to fully use two. I also don't know why we can't have usage meters that instead of showing "cycles CPUs were kept busy" shows actual throughput improvement OVER a single processor, nor why we can't have anyone championing a dev environment and new languages that actually not only support multithread (and threadsafe by design) but also the memory management support for it that is so badly needed. But hey this industry never lost any sleep before knowing the king was stark naked but not daring to say anything about it...

Edward L. Scott
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
Edward L. Scott   5/24/2013 3:54:03 PM
NO RATINGS
If my quick web search is accurate, a silicon crystal's lattice is 5.43 Angstroms wide, or .543 Nanometers. At the 5 nanometer node this means 5 nanometer transistor junctions are: 5 nm / .543 = 9.2 silicon atoms (lattice lengths) wide. At this point, it seems like quantum effects could become critical (tunneling?) as to whether the CMOS transistor would even work, even if the manufacturing is possible. Below 5 NM, any such issues would seem to aggravate rather quickly. I'm not a semiconductor scientist, but I'm curious what others may have to teach me here. Are carbon-based (grapheme?) transistors the more plausible way forward?

Edward L. Scott
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
Edward L. Scott   5/24/2013 3:54:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Graphene - sorry

ANON1255185289979
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom: Time to prepare for the end of Moore’s Law
ANON1255185289979   5/24/2013 4:26:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Moore's Law is not about bandwidth, clock speed, or transistor type (CMOS, NMOS etc.). The Law is about doubling density, performance and reduced cost. As Intel and others reach for the third dimension and explore graphene and other promising materials the door to continue the Moore's Law (actually Moore's Goal) will outlive its critics and naysayers(all of whom think they are realists but in fact are just devoid of any imagination).

<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Oh, No! My Antique Analog Meter Has Twitched Its Last
Max Maxfield
20 comments
Well, life is certainly full of ups and downs, isn't it? When it comes to the antique analog meters I'm using in a number of my hobby projects, things appeared to be going swimmingly well, ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)