Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Larry M
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
Larry M   5/31/2013 6:18:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I would not "give credit" to the Europeans for RoHS. RoHS in fact is responsible for premature electronic failures due to brittle solders which cause chips to fall off circuit boards and for tin whiskers which cause short circuits between adjacent conductors. This not only affects cellphones but cameras, GPS units, audio and video gear, computers, tablets, and home theaters. The misguided Europeans and their RoHS have done more to increase electronic waste than any 2-year American cellphone contract.

VK CA
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
VK CA   5/29/2013 6:28:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Let Europeans enjoy the fruits of their government solving their evryday problems. There is a side effects of letting governments babyseat their subjects. Bulk of recicling waste is not smatphones. I buy a smartphone once in 1-3 years, but we recicle packaging, bottles ... ~20 pounds a week. Besides, there is battery recicling that adresses really toxic part of the phone. My suggestion is to youse your own head before running to government and asking them to think instead of you.

DataMuncher
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
DataMuncher   5/29/2013 6:47:24 AM
NO RATINGS
The real measure might be to compare phone lifespans between carriers/plans with subsidies vs. carriers/plans without subsidies. Of course you might have to control for disposable income of purchaser as well.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
Peter Clarke   5/28/2013 9:53:15 AM
NO RATINGS
@DataMuncher It's an argument. Are the short life times driven by subsidy or by the rapid addition of "features" enabled by good ol' Moore's Law? I notice that U.K. mobile hone service provider O2 are advertizing a two-year contract where you can upgrade your phone whenever within the same contract so that you can always have the "latest" phone. That could accelerate obsolesence?

PCor
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
PCor   5/27/2013 12:54:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Regulation to cover repairabilty would be the best method. Removing built in obsolesence is another factor. But our industry is based upon quartely growth not long term environmental impact issues.

DataMuncher
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
DataMuncher   5/27/2013 4:42:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Peter, I''ll take the controversial view that smartphones actually reduce ewaste by replacing multiple consumer devices (cameras, video cameras, nav systems, mp3 players, e-books), all of which had similarly limited lifetimes. I merely have to look into my junkroom to be reminded of the number of obsolete consumer goodies I still cling to and the dozens more that entered the waste stream (after recycling the batteries). I believe we're better off to pre-cycle (buy fewer, more capable things) than focusing on recycling. I think we'll hold on to phones longer as the carrier subsidies fade.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
Bert22306   5/26/2013 10:34:17 PM
NO RATINGS
So, let's assume that what Frank says makes sense, since it seems to. The precious metals that one would have to worry about, in recycling, are in the phones but not in the chips themselves? So, what major role would Qualcomm have to play in this recycling regard? Is Qualcomm still making phones, and somehow I missed that? As to whether Europeans or Americans worry more about recycling, I'm not sure what the actual answer is. I know that recycling technology in the US seems to be increasing year after year. To where now, just judging from our own trash at home, we put a whole lot more volume of trash in the recycling bin than in the other one. Way, way more. Because they keep relaxing what items can be recycled. So I would dispute any notion that it doesn't matter in the US, even if we don't talk about it as much.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
old account Frank Eory   5/26/2013 2:03:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the author is referring to precious metals in other parts of the phone, not in the ICs. Batteries contain cobalt and LCD panels contain indium -- not exactly precious metals, but rare earth metals.

pscalare
User Rank
Rookie
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
pscalare   5/26/2013 3:37:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Exactly what precious metals are presnt in a modern IC? I would only expect alloy leadframes and minute amounts of aluminum and/or copper interconnect. I haven't seen gold used since the 1970's...

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Brussels Calling: Qualcomm wins in a wasteful industry
docdivakar   5/24/2013 8:31:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Understood Peter! I do give credit to the European initiatives where it is due, as in WEEE and RoHS. I think these efforts do not go far enough regarding rare-earth & precious metals recovery from eWaste. MP Divakar

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
10 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).