Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: Ethernet yesterday, today and tomorrow
Bert22306   5/29/2013 1:29:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that would be great. When I first encountered the spanning tree algorithm, I instantly recognized it as being the "minimal cost flow problem" described by Ford and Fulkerson.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Slideshow: Ethernet yesterday, today and tomorrow
rick merritt   5/29/2013 12:49:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Metcalfe and others at the event were clear only two things remain of the original Ethernet--the name and the packet format. As for spanning tree, no one mentioned prior art. I'll see if I can get Radia to chime in.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: Ethernet yesterday, today and tomorrow
Bert22306   5/29/2013 12:14:43 AM
NO RATINGS
BTW, I was intrigued by the notion of "routing by name." Seems understandable enough that a name, assuming it's unique, is just as good an identifier as a 48-bit MAC address. My problem is, though, that unless names are carefully constructed, they will end up being just as un-hierarchical as MAC addresses are. Which makes actual "routing" a matter of every router having a list of all names. Hmmm.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: Ethernet yesterday, today and tomorrow
Bert22306   5/28/2013 8:53:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Not to detract from the achievements of these smart people, but I don't think that this is the whole story. Necessarily. For example, what Metcalfe did was brilliant, but little of it survives in today's Ethernet. The format of the basic "type" frame, yes. The carrier sense and collision detect protocol, with backoff, not really. That's not how the Ethenets work anymore. Ethernets of today are actually much simpler. Just fire off those frames, and if there's a traffic jam at a merge point, put them in a queue. (And all sorts of more or less implemented schemes for prioriting frames in a queue, which are not really standardized.) If that original CSMA/CD protocol is used at all, it's only as a legacy protocol in a single host-switch interface. Does nothing to control traffic jams anymore. The spanning tree protocol, I studied that from a book called "Flows in Networks," L.K Ford and D.R. Fulkerson, where the initial edition was dated 1962. It was applied to Ethernet, later on when switches were used to tie together Ethernet links, true enough. And it works very well indeed. And Radia's book is a good read, humorous, and even engrossing. But how about those other two very smart people, back in 1962?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Slideshow: Ethernet yesterday, today and tomorrow
rick merritt   5/28/2013 7:44:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Got an Ethernet war story to add...or a poem?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
3 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Max Maxfield

Juggling a Cornucopia of Projects
Max Maxfield
19 comments
I feel like I'm juggling a lot of hobby projects at the moment. The problem is that I can't juggle. Actually, that's not strictly true -- I can juggle ten fine china dinner plates, but ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
39 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
144 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)