Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
rich.pell
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
rich.pell   6/29/2013 3:50:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Snakes are actually very popular as pets, so I don't think I'd be so quick to dismiss this as an intentional joke. Whether the collar itself is actually practical or not is another question entirely!

ccalvin
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
ccalvin   6/21/2013 7:05:42 PM
NO RATINGS
While the collar-to-the-snake attachment is non-trivial, I think that I would prefer that tether (401) be rigid.

Battar
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
Battar   6/11/2013 6:09:34 AM
NO RATINGS
The text of the abstract and claim shows up the apparent inability of patent attorneys to construct a coherent sentence in English. They gain little respect among engineers whose job generally includes writing technicial specifications which are used to actually construct the invention. But why submit the application? How would you enforce it? I don't believe there is a market for these devices, and I would hesitate to take up a legal battle with someone whose hobbies include taking pet snakes for walks. (or slithers)

anon6223816
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
anon6223816   6/10/2013 7:25:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The USPTO pays for its operation with its fees. I suspect the examiner found no prior art. It serves a useful(?) purpose, and therefore has utility. Cha-ching goes the cash register -- thank you Mr. Inventor for playing today. Please play again. Bring money. ;-). I'd like to see the inventor put one of those on a reticulated python, or a black racer. "Slither", indeed.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
BrianBailey   6/10/2013 5:59:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Right - why would anyone care, so just issue it.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
Duane Benson   6/8/2013 8:45:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I really wonder how some of these patents can be issued with a straight face. Nonsensical technical patents are one thing. It's not good, but I can understand how something gets through that sounds viable to a laymen but is nonsense to a highly skilled engineer. But a snake collar? From my perspective, it's either an intentional joke from the patent office, involved judicious amounts of alcohol or shoes that someone just plain doesn't care.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).