Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 7 / 10   >   >>
FireBadTreePretty
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
FireBadTreePretty   6/13/2013 6:01:34 PM
NO RATINGS
What! You forgot to pick up your check. Or do you just like to post Intel FUD.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
eewiz   6/13/2013 5:39:41 PM
NO RATINGS
You missed the current drain part... It's same performance at half the power

JLB911
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
JLB911   6/13/2013 4:03:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Am I mistaken or what??? The benchmark results do not show Intel outperforming the ARMs. It appears only marginally better than the Exynos one and it underperforms when compared to the others (CPU, 2D, 3D and Performance Index... forget about the RAM access, which does not mean much).

chipmonk0
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
chipmonk0   6/13/2013 3:09:01 PM
NO RATINGS
DELIBERATELY USING CAPITAL TO DRAW THE ATTENTION OF PETER CLARKE : Considering the significance of these test results and the controversy it has raised ( as seen from the Comments here ) will it be possible for you ask ABI Research to provide additional technical details on (a) the Benchmark programs ( were they industry standard ? ), test procedures for measuring current nto CPU etc.

ntz
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
ntz   6/13/2013 2:35:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Now tell us, how much did Intel pay you to put this piece of **** on?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
mcgrathdylan   6/13/2013 2:32:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@FireBadTreePretty- thanks for sharing your opinion. But for the record This is not paid Intel marketing.

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Wilco1   6/13/2013 1:20:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes it is a well-known fact that browsers and JIT compilers vary a lot in performance, even between versions. Worse, it's relatively easy to use compiler tricks to make tiny JIT benchmarks (such as SunSpider) appear much faster than they really are. So if you want to compare actual performance then these micro benchmarks don't provide a good estimate - not for native performance and not for JIT compiled code.

sw guy
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
sw guy   6/13/2013 10:50:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, if benchmark source language is java, then JVM (JIT compiler that is) implementation may matter more more than actual CPU architecture. And Intel is not novice regarding compilers.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/13/2013 3:29:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Since 22 nm is also quad core compared to 32 nm dual core, that might be right.

justfine
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
justfine   6/13/2013 12:50:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel at Computex said the 22nm Merrifield will boost performance by 50 percent while reducing energy comsumption

<<   <   Page 7 / 10   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).