Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 7 / 10   >   >>
FireBadTreePretty
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
FireBadTreePretty   6/13/2013 6:01:34 PM
NO RATINGS
What! You forgot to pick up your check. Or do you just like to post Intel FUD.

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
eewiz   6/13/2013 5:39:41 PM
NO RATINGS
You missed the current drain part... It's same performance at half the power

JLB911
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
JLB911   6/13/2013 4:03:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Am I mistaken or what??? The benchmark results do not show Intel outperforming the ARMs. It appears only marginally better than the Exynos one and it underperforms when compared to the others (CPU, 2D, 3D and Performance Index... forget about the RAM access, which does not mean much).

chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
chipmonk0   6/13/2013 3:09:01 PM
NO RATINGS
DELIBERATELY USING CAPITAL TO DRAW THE ATTENTION OF PETER CLARKE : Considering the significance of these test results and the controversy it has raised ( as seen from the Comments here ) will it be possible for you ask ABI Research to provide additional technical details on (a) the Benchmark programs ( were they industry standard ? ), test procedures for measuring current nto CPU etc.

ntz
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
ntz   6/13/2013 2:35:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Now tell us, how much did Intel pay you to put this piece of **** on?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
mcgrathdylan   6/13/2013 2:32:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@FireBadTreePretty- thanks for sharing your opinion. But for the record This is not paid Intel marketing.

Wilco1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Wilco1   6/13/2013 1:20:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes it is a well-known fact that browsers and JIT compilers vary a lot in performance, even between versions. Worse, it's relatively easy to use compiler tricks to make tiny JIT benchmarks (such as SunSpider) appear much faster than they really are. So if you want to compare actual performance then these micro benchmarks don't provide a good estimate - not for native performance and not for JIT compiled code.

sw guy
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
sw guy   6/13/2013 10:50:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, if benchmark source language is java, then JVM (JIT compiler that is) implementation may matter more more than actual CPU architecture. And Intel is not novice regarding compilers.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/13/2013 3:29:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Since 22 nm is also quad core compared to 32 nm dual core, that might be right.

justfine
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
justfine   6/13/2013 12:50:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel at Computex said the 22nm Merrifield will boost performance by 50 percent while reducing energy comsumption

<<   <   Page 7 / 10   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Most Recent Comments
R_Colin_Johnson
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
sranje
 
GeoffBoyd
 
javier ruiz
 
Garcia-Lasheras
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
MeasurementBlues
 
TonyTib
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...