Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 6 / 10   >   >>
Youself
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Youself   6/14/2013 2:25:02 AM
NO RATINGS
wow... seems like the ARM guys are up in ARMS about this benchmark... the tenor of their alarm disguised as s(k)epeticism (yes we spell it with a K here) is hinting at their allegiance in this fight. I really don't care, except made in the USA is always good for me.

Youself
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Youself   6/14/2013 2:20:41 AM
NO RATINGS
well if you post your real name like Dylan, maybe you'll be taken more seriously.

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Wilco1   6/14/2013 12:32:05 AM
NO RATINGS
The benchmark used and methodology does really matter a lot. If you load your car with heavy stuff, do you expect to achieve the same top speed or petrol consumption? Note that current drain is not relevant, what you really want to measure is task energy (which requires voltage and time to complete a task). Also it's not news that Intel can make a phone CPU with reasonable battery life, eg. Lava XOLO and Razr I early 2012. The Z2580 in K900 is simply the dual core variant.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
old account Frank Eory   6/13/2013 11:22:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Regardless of questions about whether these were the best benchmarks for mobile, or whether the source was Java or whatever, the point remains that it looks like Intel has made some real progress on reducing current drain while providing a level of performance suitable for a smartphone. Better, equal or just slightly worse than competing architectures is less critical right now (unless you're the Intel sales guy) than the fact that they appear to finally have a processor worthy of running on a smartphone's modest battery capacity. We will all get a much clearer picture once they are designed into a few more phones with wider deployment.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
TarraTarra!   6/13/2013 10:17:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree. The benchmark setup and detailed results should be published. It is very easy to chose data that makes once processor look better than the other. The other question is which intel parts are they using? Are these a select few parts screened from hundreds for their favorable power characteristics? There is usually silicon variation and it is possible to find a few parts that work well but these numbers will be difficult to reproduce in volume production. Looks to me like this is Intel marketing at work.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/13/2013 8:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
The results appear biased because the pro-Intel sentences were picked out. We need the full details.

Phadreus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Phadreus   6/13/2013 7:33:45 PM
NO RATINGS
What Rubbish.. Comparing a latest Intel processor with the 3 year old Tegra 3..Please do a fair comparison with Tegra 4 or Tegra 4i

JanR1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
JanR1   6/13/2013 7:27:05 PM
NO RATINGS
It should really read "Intel" where it is "Inal". Sorry for the typo.

JanR1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
JanR1   6/13/2013 7:26:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice discussion. Reminds me of the Inal fanboy vs. AMD fanboy discussions back then...

gatorfan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
gatorfan   6/13/2013 6:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
...and these numbers matter why? The reason Apple and Samsung don't publish benchmarks like this is because they don't matter. Unless you plan to run SETI@home on your mobile, these numbers mean next to nothing.

<<   <   Page 6 / 10   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).