Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 10   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/18/2013 1:04:26 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm not arguing the relative comparison which shows less power consumption at comparable performance by a processor. I'm arguing this is only a small portion of the battery life consideration. Other considerations like camera use may matter more to users, in the final purchase decision.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/18/2013 12:57:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Sure but we know battery life even under normal conditions exceeds 3 hrs, such as in the laptop battery test, regardless of processor. http://blog.laptopmag.com/best-battery-life-longest-lasting-smart-phones

alche
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
alche   6/18/2013 12:57:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Don't see how the argument is valid. If one drives a car with engine at redline, the MPG would not be anywhere near the advertized. Do you use laptop or cell running non-stop math and graphics? On the other hand, the relative performance is meaningful, unless you happen to be on the losing side, that is.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/18/2013 12:44:58 AM
NO RATINGS
It's pretty clear the benchmark is democratically useless. The conditions are not real world.

J---
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
J---   6/17/2013 11:10:08 PM
NO RATINGS
If one was to run any of these benchmark repeatedly, the phones battery would die quite quickly. However, we know that is not the case. However, processor power&performance does come into play in terms of total battery life and hence is important.

J---
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
J---   6/17/2013 11:05:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Les, my irritation if any is because I believe you are arguing semantics when the details really quite simple and this discussion relates to the article. Arguing semantics is not professional. - Task time is inversely proportional to processing speed. Note that processing speed is one of the factors listed in this article. - Power is directly proportional to average current (again, covered in this article). Task Energy is proportional to (power)/(processing speed). There are no other complexities. As this article stated, processing speed for the Intel chips were on part with the ARM chips, while average (and peak) current draw was significantly less. The ONLY interpretation that can be made is that task energy will be less. Any other conclusion would be to argue semantics.

alche
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
alche   6/17/2013 10:37:54 PM
NO RATINGS
By the same measure the ARM camp will be drained in 1.25 hrs, so I guess all those Droids and i- phones must be even more useless ):

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/17/2013 9:36:42 PM
NO RATINGS
With the 2500 mAh battery, the Lenovo k900 should be drained at 1 A in 2.5 hrs, which would not sell. Shows how useless this benchmark is, even for Intel ironically.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/17/2013 7:00:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes the RF and baseband would be better to be listed explicitly in the benchmark, until it is integrated with the processor.

sriram87
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
sriram87   6/17/2013 6:35:05 PM
NO RATINGS
CloverTrail+ is an SOC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_on_chip Other vendors such as Qualcomm, Nvidia, ARM doesn't build anything more than that. Correct me if I am wrong.

<<   <   Page 2 / 10   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...