Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 10   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/18/2013 1:04:26 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm not arguing the relative comparison which shows less power consumption at comparable performance by a processor. I'm arguing this is only a small portion of the battery life consideration. Other considerations like camera use may matter more to users, in the final purchase decision.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/18/2013 12:57:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Sure but we know battery life even under normal conditions exceeds 3 hrs, such as in the laptop battery test, regardless of processor. http://blog.laptopmag.com/best-battery-life-longest-lasting-smart-phones

alche
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
alche   6/18/2013 12:57:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Don't see how the argument is valid. If one drives a car with engine at redline, the MPG would not be anywhere near the advertized. Do you use laptop or cell running non-stop math and graphics? On the other hand, the relative performance is meaningful, unless you happen to be on the losing side, that is.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/18/2013 12:44:58 AM
NO RATINGS
It's pretty clear the benchmark is democratically useless. The conditions are not real world.

J---
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
J---   6/17/2013 11:10:08 PM
NO RATINGS
If one was to run any of these benchmark repeatedly, the phones battery would die quite quickly. However, we know that is not the case. However, processor power&performance does come into play in terms of total battery life and hence is important.

J---
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
J---   6/17/2013 11:05:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Les, my irritation if any is because I believe you are arguing semantics when the details really quite simple and this discussion relates to the article. Arguing semantics is not professional. - Task time is inversely proportional to processing speed. Note that processing speed is one of the factors listed in this article. - Power is directly proportional to average current (again, covered in this article). Task Energy is proportional to (power)/(processing speed). There are no other complexities. As this article stated, processing speed for the Intel chips were on part with the ARM chips, while average (and peak) current draw was significantly less. The ONLY interpretation that can be made is that task energy will be less. Any other conclusion would be to argue semantics.

alche
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
alche   6/17/2013 10:37:54 PM
NO RATINGS
By the same measure the ARM camp will be drained in 1.25 hrs, so I guess all those Droids and i- phones must be even more useless ):

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/17/2013 9:36:42 PM
NO RATINGS
With the 2500 mAh battery, the Lenovo k900 should be drained at 1 A in 2.5 hrs, which would not sell. Shows how useless this benchmark is, even for Intel ironically.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/17/2013 7:00:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes the RF and baseband would be better to be listed explicitly in the benchmark, until it is integrated with the processor.

sriram87
User Rank
Author
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
sriram87   6/17/2013 6:35:05 PM
NO RATINGS
CloverTrail+ is an SOC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_on_chip Other vendors such as Qualcomm, Nvidia, ARM doesn't build anything more than that. Correct me if I am wrong.

<<   <   Page 2 / 10   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...