I have read of other programs running much faster and boot up times being significantly better with an SSD. I would be very curious to know what others experience was with SSDs relative to the normal types of software performance, please add your comments on the speed up/down and what software was running.
While flash SSDs are taking over some HDD apps here and there, te need for HDD storage for all those facebook and Google photos is exploding. The net result: HDDs are doing pretty darned good these days.
I would love to run with a SSD but given the real world cost comparison with HDDs unless I need the speed I can't afford the cost.. I can however get my employer to spring for the improvement in speed and performance. Some day when the cost comes down I will be first in line for one, but for now..
Bytes per Buck:
A 250 or 500 G drive is enough for me to run windows on very nicely.
SSD's are preceived as better than HDD.
Once SSD's hit the point that they were 'affordable' , then they take off.
as they have.
less than 1 $ per GByte, seems to be the tipping point,
"That pricing limitation seems to be evaporating"? NAND ASPs are up significantly lately, so that seems highly unlikely. SSD's are being adopted due to size, speed, and power consumption, not price, and it will probably be a long time, if ever, that the price threshold is crossed. The 50% higher number seems a bit odd as well. Go to Newegg...a 500GB drive is about $400 for SSD vs about $70 for HDD. Percentage...hmm...that's about 450% higher. Obviously features besides price drive market share, and it would be good if the article delved into those market dynamics rather than making false statements about cost.
Blog Doing Math in FPGAs Tom Burke 2 comments For a recent project, I explored doing "real" (that is, non-integer) math on a Spartan 3 FPGA. FPGAs, by their nature, do integer math. That is, there's no floating-point ...