Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Neo10
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
Neo10   6/19/2013 5:23:28 AM
NO RATINGS
IBM aims to become a pure software systems company, so they are jettisoning the hardware related domains gradually.

oster
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
oster   6/18/2013 10:09:27 PM
NO RATINGS
But tech jobs also get shipped abroad to places with more regulation and sometimes higher corporate taxes. Certainly, many of the countries with growing semiconductor industries rank lower than the U.S. in the World Bank's "Doing Business" report. A personal opinion, but because political opinions about small government attract a lot more airplay in America than elsewhere, a perception of impenetrable bureaucracy tends to develop amongst Americans more frequently than for other people, but really, American regulations are relatively lax compared to many other countries.

pinhead1
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
pinhead1   6/18/2013 9:08:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think that was ever really the plan for the Fishkill fab, though. I think from the outset, it was there to supply IBM's internal needs, and all of the foundry/partnering activities were just to shore up the finances.

luting
User Rank
CEO
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
luting   6/18/2013 8:32:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I think that is pretty much what is expected, soon or late. There is no way IBM able to compete with TSMC and Samsung in foundry business.

smartbost
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
smartbost   6/18/2013 7:51:03 PM
NO RATINGS
With IBM exit, there will be even less Industrial R&D in semiconductors. It is a sad day, in my opinion.

ssliva
User Rank
Freelancer
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
ssliva   6/18/2013 4:25:46 PM
NO RATINGS
IBM doesn't invest in businesses that don't help increase EPS. I do think the new CEO might be less inclined to look favorably on peripheral businesses that support the big iron cash cow, though. That could hurt over the long run.

SmokeNoMore
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
SmokeNoMore   6/18/2013 4:14:42 PM
NO RATINGS
IBM is exiting the US semiconductor business because the profit margins are too "low". The company enjoys higher profit margins on services. The foundry boys thought they could sustain themselves by producing one-hit-wonders like game console chips. When that business dried up - they were toast. They'll probably continue to produce ASICs but the ASIC services will not be centered in the USA.

Bond Number
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
Bond Number   6/18/2013 2:15:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Didnt know "buddy" was considered name calling. Please demonstrate where lower corporate taxes was the major driving force behind long term growth. I never said that lower corporate taxes are a bad thing. I just said that it is not the leading cause, and it alone can not change the long term climate. I think you misunderstood the thinking comment. Why would you not think countries in the span of decades are not capable of changing their business policies?

JimMcGregor
User Rank
Blogger
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
JimMcGregor   6/18/2013 2:10:51 PM
NO RATINGS
IBM has evolved into a company focused on systems, software, and services. in addition, the market for the ASICs and big iron processors IBM has developed for internal and external use has decreased. So, the announcement should not be a shocker. IBM is still a strong competitor, but semiconductors are no longer a key core competency for the organization.

Consultofactus
User Rank
Rookie
re: What do IBM layoffs mean for New York's chip initiative?
Consultofactus   6/18/2013 12:51:58 PM
NO RATINGS
This is what passes for discourse for some people - Bond Number cannot refute the demonstrably true statement that the lower taxes and pro-business attitudes in China and Russia are important factors in US companies out-sourcing so he reverts to what he knows best, name calling. And then he finishes with the suggestion that "some people should think a little more"....classic!

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
23 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).