Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
betajet
User Rank
Author
re: DAC Keynote from James Truchard
betajet   6/19/2013 7:29:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Let me ramble a comment here. First, what the spreadsheet did for financial analysis is that it took a format and techniques that had been used for centuries and automated them, so that people could try different inputs and see the results instantly in place of weeks of error-prone calculations. This was a game changer, but not because it involved new ideas -- it just sped up the application of very old ideas. I've been watching CAD/CAE/DA for a long time, and it does a good job of handling details so that you have a good chance at first-pass silicon and PC boards that either work or are at least usable. However, clever design ideas come from clever design engineers who have lots experience and have learned lots of tricks over their careers. I don't see how this is going to be automated any time soon, except in very restricted domains where you don't need to be clever. IMO hardware and software are very different beasts and require very different mind-sets. With hardware, you try to keep things simple and clever so the hardware will be fast and cheap. With software, you have the luxury of cheap complexity, and relatively few opportunities for parallelism that might speed things up. Automatically converting software into fast, parallel hardware sounds attractive, but IMO it's not going to beat a clever designer who really knows the hardware technology to be used. You'll probably end up with bloated FPGAs instead, which should make FPGA vendors happy because those are the chips with big profit margins. At a talk I saw at the recent Design West, one speaker gave an interesting perspective on the VHDL versus Verilog question. He likes people to design FPGAs in VHDL precisely because it doesn't look like software. He finds that Verilog causes people to think FPGAs are like software and come up with poor designs.



Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.