Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: 10GBase-T gains traction, but still too power hungry
a.sun   6/23/2013 7:22:31 PM
2-3W/port may be not an issue for server blades as not many of them are used. But it could be a big issue for ToR switch which may have up to 60 of them in 1U. I guess you have to use the same type of connectors on both ends of a cable especially in the case of an electrical or an optical cable. Considering a 10Gbase-SR consumes much less power than a 10Gbase-T.

User Rank
re: 10GBase-T gains traction, but still too power hungry
docdivakar   6/21/2013 5:47:15 PM
I agree that with 2-3W/port power consumption as not a big deal (the first generation PHY's were in the 10W/port range). In comparison the FCoE ports are in the 1-1.5W/port range and also have advantages of supporting two different fabrics. The power consumption in the 5W/port range is a concern for server blades but even those can be adequately designed for thermal margins. MP Divakar

User Rank
re: 10GBase-T gains traction, but still too power hungry
markhahn0   6/21/2013 4:32:57 AM
that last comment about PHY power needs some justification. why would 2-3W/port be considered a big deal? we're talking about a couple ports per server, so that's about 1% of the power budget. price (incl switching) is the big problem. especially since for HPC, neither latency nor bandwidth are competitive with IB.

User Rank
re: 10GBase-T gains traction, but still too power hungry
docdivakar   6/20/2013 7:55:26 PM
The ASPs have to go further south of $200 per 10GBase-T ports for the base-T market to proliferate. The power issue has been a well-known concern for years now, I hope the smaller node and less power hungry designs can alleviate it. What the article did not mention is the fact that many data centers are already wired for 10G base-T BUT have not yet fully utilized the fabric. It would be nice to know what percentage of 10G base-T fabric is still using the 1G appliances. MP Divakar Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...