Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
shawn.toomath
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
shawn.toomath   6/27/2013 4:24:10 AM
NO RATINGS
I am long on TSMC, Xilinx, Xmos etc..

shawn.toomath
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
shawn.toomath   6/27/2013 4:22:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel;;; The Last Time intel got invoked with the EDA industry, Intel destroyed, ALPHA, PA~RISC, MIPS, and had POWER and SPARC not pulled their OS/support from the platform, they be dead too. ALAS! Intel at it again, this time in the fpga sector. sO they seem to think FPGA's are the Big Deal competition. Their a wonder fuck company.

HS_SemiPro
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
HS_SemiPro   6/25/2013 4:48:45 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung made good use of their Tech and Fab to edge past Apple in Global Smart phone sales, Apple couldn't get suppliers fast enough to replace Samsung, and Plus their arrogance that other can't come up with innovative stuff. Intel paid a big price for being arrogant, and not investing in Mobile business.

Doug_S
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
Doug_S   6/25/2013 12:34:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Presumably Samsung will make the A7, which would be just a tweaked A6. Why do you think Apple needs a "Galaxy killer"? You think they need quad core just because S3/S4 has it, or need to beat Samsung on pointless benchmarks? What for? Apple generally doesn't market on specs, they tend to market on what enhanced specs will do the user. I doubt A7 will have quad cores, which is mostly useless in mobile, they'll put any extra silicon area where it matters more, in the GPU.

Doug_S
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
Doug_S   6/25/2013 12:30:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Too early to tell. Intel doesn't have the capacity necessary to supply Apple right now - consider that Apple would need well over 100 million SoCs per year if they wanted the one for their high end product made by Intel, and compare that to Intel's existing volumes. When Intel starts ramping 450mm production they'll have a lot more capacity and would then be able to supply Apple. Doesn't mean they will come to an agreement with Apple, but they would at least have the opportunity to do so, which currently is not the case.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
old account Frank Eory   6/24/2013 11:06:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Is there even an A7, or is that just a rumor too?

chanj0
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
chanj0   6/24/2013 11:04:48 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not too sure about relationship with Intel. After all, Intel makes processor and very eager to get a chuck of mobile device market. In Apple point of view, Intel is not an ideal partner. With this in mind, I'm sure the "independent" foundry would have an advantage to strike a partnership deal with any MCU design house.

ChrisGar
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
ChrisGar   6/24/2013 9:33:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Most microelectronics companies know not to burn any bridges.

mach665
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
mach665   6/24/2013 8:34:44 PM
NO RATINGS
If Samsung does that, the only customer it can get for its fab will be itself.

bordersboy
User Rank
Author
re: TSMC signs up Apple for three-year FinFET deal
bordersboy   6/24/2013 5:36:31 PM
NO RATINGS
If I were Samsung I'd do an Apple and just chop them. The Cupertino boys would get a taste of their own medicine. When you see how many suppliers they stiffed over the years it would be such a hoot to watch

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...