Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Jagdish Bisawa
User Rank
Rookie
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
Jagdish Bisawa   12/19/2010 5:54:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, it appears, in all probability, from your description that the voltage spikes are causing this abnormal behaviour. Else, how would the data be written to a 0 when the unused value is a 1 ? So, as suggested by Zeeglen, get hold of a medical centre to help you in exposing the tags to a bunch of X-Rays & simulate the error to correlate with the actual findings.

Rocket_G
User Rank
Rookie
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
Rocket_G   12/16/2010 4:34:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually we haven't isolated the failure to any component yet -- the PV cell just seems most sensitive to radiation. Good point about the scanner, though I wonder how much RFI it would generate nearby. Only the tags that pass initial testing are deployed; these failures are observed after they've been in use. Excessive sunlight? The PV cells handle a 10 000 lux desk lamp with no problem ("bright sunlight" is supposedly around 6000). There's a series diode protecting the battery from discharge through the LDO. Only thing I can think of adding to the controlled test is the cold and shock environment when attached to a downhill ski ;-)

Rocket_G
User Rank
Rookie
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
Rocket_G   12/16/2010 4:24:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Logging data on many was either corrupted or absent, and a number of tags had zeros in flash locations that should not have been zero (unprogrammed state is '1'.)

Rocket_G
User Rank
Rookie
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
Rocket_G   12/16/2010 4:21:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that's where we're looking - voltage spikes would be disruptive if not damaging.

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Rookie
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
unknown multiplier   12/16/2010 2:47:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd imagine the PV is mostly transparent to X-rays, but the photoelectrons generated by X-rays would potentially be more damaging.

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
zeeglen   12/14/2010 9:41:00 PM
NO RATINGS
From your description it sounds like you have determined that the PV cells are the failing components. Didn't think carry-on goes through the full body scanner along with the passenger. Are the failures discovered before or after they have been in use? Are they tested by the user before attaching to the birds? If they fail in use could be excessive sunlight. Is there a focusing lens that might be overheating the cell? Is there any chance a fully charged battery could be reverse biasing back through the LDO in the dark? For Xray test can you get a local medical clinic or dentist to zap known good tags then retest? Or better yet try a more thorough controlled test. Have your boss approve a field trial at an environmentally hostile place such as Hawaii or Bahamas or Mediterranean or Rio. Send some of your tags UPS, FedEx, some checked baggage, some carry on. Test them all at arrival. Then bring the good ones to the beach and let them soak up the bright sun for a few days of more testing. (Don't forget your suntan lotion). After about a week you can return home, repeat the tests on the remaining good units from the beach, and write your test report. Would be interesting to see whether it is Xrays or sunlight causing the failures.

parity
User Rank
Rookie
re: X-rays and Photovoltaics
parity   12/14/2010 6:33:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Rich, can you supply a little more information of the failure mode? What element of the logging tags is failing? Do they fail the same way each time? If the tags are tested good, then shipped and arrive with failures it could be simple electrostatic discharge, especially if the receiving site has naturally low humidity.

Rocket_G
User Rank
Rookie
X-rays and Photovoltaics
Rocket_G   12/14/2010 3:54:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Part of my work involves designing small solar-powered logging and telemetry tags for studying bird migration, etc. We've encountered some mysterious failures in logging tags and are wondering if some could be due to X-ray irradiation during air shipment (FedEx, checked and carry-on baggage inspection.) We feed the output of an 8-pin SOIC PV cell through an LDO regulator to sense light levels and charge a lithium coin cell which powers a PIC microcontroller. I wonder if the PV cell might be particularly sensitive to X-rays (or the RF from full-body scanners?) -- the manufacturer hasn't done any X-ray testing, citing prohibitive cost. Can anyone point me to some info and guidelines on the subject? Thanks! Rich Gabrielson, Research Engineer Bioacoustics Research Program Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology 95 Brown Road Mail Slot 1012 Ithaca NY 14850

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).