Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   8/20/2011 1:16:01 AM
NO RATINGS
I think 6LoWPAN is more toward the WiFi portion.

Horaira
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Horaira   8/18/2011 12:49:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Where does 6LoWPAN fits in this ?

Scope Guru
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Scope Guru   7/15/2011 8:50:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Bluetooth has a higher data rate and lower latency for applications like voice and compressed video. The higher data rate allows you to move media between devices and peripherals. The future focus of Bluetooth is higher data rates at lower powers over a personal area (10 meters). Zigbee has a higher latency and lower data rate. It can be meshed with other devices to create a wider coverage area. It is not the best for voice, but it is good for command and control. As mentioned, low power applications where the battery will outlive the device ….10+ years on a TV remote control. It is also a good application for home automation control and retrofitting automation control without wires and tearing through walls: HVAC, lighting, alarm control, etc. Peripherals like mice and keyboard might be interesting applications, but if your keyboard has a high-speed USB connector on it … you are likely to need Bluetooth, not Zigbee to move that data. As wireless technology becomes ubiquitous year after year, there is room for each of these technologies to fit the many conveniences of daily life. It would be very interesting to see what wireless technologies are used for different applications at the next CES show. I bet we even see a lot of really high speed wireless video applications in the 60GHz IEEE 802.11 space (WiGig) start to emerge. New wireless standards in unlicensed bands continue to emerge to meet consumer demand. Over the last 20 years, for the most part, the uses wireless technology has far exceeded the wildest of expectations. As new wireless technology is introduced, new applications of that technology are developed. In 1991, who had a cell phone. In 2011, who can live without one. In 1991, remote key FOB’s where for high-end cars. In 2011, I can start my car from my phone through the wireless network. In 1991, handheld GPS devices were just becoming commercial. In 2011, I got an app for that! Darren McCarthy, RF Test at Tektronix

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   7/12/2011 2:08:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Between Zigbee and Bluetooth i believe the application profiles are slightly different though.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Bert22306   7/12/2011 12:58:26 AM
NO RATINGS
I dunno. My thinking is that this is just another example of similar protocols that do similar jobs, and either one could be developed to take over the other's applications completely. Sort of like Tornado vs FireWire vs USB. The one that is technically superior today is not necessarily the one that wins long term, either. I had to check to see which one had the IEEE blessing. Zigbee. But Bluetooth is specified to a much higher speed - 2.1 Mb/s vs 250 Kb/s. Both are essentially link layer protocols, and in principle you can layer networking on top of that just as easily with one as the other. Zigbee is spread spectrum, direct sequence, and Bluetooth is also spread spectrum, but frequency hopping. Seems to me, people benefit financially from creating all of these redundant schemes, and that's why we have so many.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   7/9/2011 10:42:25 AM
NO RATINGS
WiFi is getting cheaper and cheaper, and with technologies such as UPnP, DLNA it can easily replace others.

Klinkenbecker
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Klinkenbecker   7/8/2011 8:31:26 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a very simplistic view of the landscape. RF4CE is being very slow to mature, mostly because of the huge installed base of IR. Zigbee is not a very power efficient protocol. Back in the 90's maybe, but advances in silicon have far outstripped the abilities of Zigbee and there are much more power efficient protocols out there. Mean-while, 802.11 (WiFi) implementations have been steadily whittling down their power requirements to the point it is becoming power competitive with both Bluetooth and Zigbee. Especially when the comparison includes the vastly superior capabilities and ubiquity of WiFi. Given that ubiquitous deployment of Wifi and the vastly superior protocol characteristics, WiFi is becoming more and more attractive in home control automation - particularly where a two tier control paradigm is envisioned (WiFi for user interaction, 'other', including HomePNA or perhaps proprietary protocols for sensing). This game is not over and is far more nuanced that the author would have us believe...

Bob Virkus
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Bob Virkus   7/5/2011 11:22:46 AM
NO RATINGS
I all sounds like a good idea and very useful, but they are going have to come with a better name that can be more easily pronounced and remembered.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
KB3001   7/3/2011 6:32:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for this Cees. That concurs with my thinking.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   7/3/2011 12:44:30 AM
NO RATINGS
What are the products currently adopting RF4CE?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Carlos Bueno

Adventures in Userland
Carlos Bueno
Post a comment
Editor’s Note: Excerpted from Lauren Ipsum: A story about computer science and other improbable things, author Carlos Bueno introduces us to Lauren and her adventures in ...

Max Maxfield

Tired Old iPad 2 vs. Shiny New iPad Air 2
Max Maxfield
9 comments
I remember when the first iPad came out deep in the mists of time we used to call 2010. Actually, that's only four years ago, but it seems like a lifetime away -- I mean; can you remember ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...