Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   8/20/2011 1:16:01 AM
NO RATINGS
I think 6LoWPAN is more toward the WiFi portion.

Horaira
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Horaira   8/18/2011 12:49:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Where does 6LoWPAN fits in this ?

Scope Guru
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Scope Guru   7/15/2011 8:50:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Bluetooth has a higher data rate and lower latency for applications like voice and compressed video. The higher data rate allows you to move media between devices and peripherals. The future focus of Bluetooth is higher data rates at lower powers over a personal area (10 meters). Zigbee has a higher latency and lower data rate. It can be meshed with other devices to create a wider coverage area. It is not the best for voice, but it is good for command and control. As mentioned, low power applications where the battery will outlive the device ….10+ years on a TV remote control. It is also a good application for home automation control and retrofitting automation control without wires and tearing through walls: HVAC, lighting, alarm control, etc. Peripherals like mice and keyboard might be interesting applications, but if your keyboard has a high-speed USB connector on it … you are likely to need Bluetooth, not Zigbee to move that data. As wireless technology becomes ubiquitous year after year, there is room for each of these technologies to fit the many conveniences of daily life. It would be very interesting to see what wireless technologies are used for different applications at the next CES show. I bet we even see a lot of really high speed wireless video applications in the 60GHz IEEE 802.11 space (WiGig) start to emerge. New wireless standards in unlicensed bands continue to emerge to meet consumer demand. Over the last 20 years, for the most part, the uses wireless technology has far exceeded the wildest of expectations. As new wireless technology is introduced, new applications of that technology are developed. In 1991, who had a cell phone. In 2011, who can live without one. In 1991, remote key FOB’s where for high-end cars. In 2011, I can start my car from my phone through the wireless network. In 1991, handheld GPS devices were just becoming commercial. In 2011, I got an app for that! Darren McCarthy, RF Test at Tektronix

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   7/12/2011 2:08:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Between Zigbee and Bluetooth i believe the application profiles are slightly different though.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Bert22306   7/12/2011 12:58:26 AM
NO RATINGS
I dunno. My thinking is that this is just another example of similar protocols that do similar jobs, and either one could be developed to take over the other's applications completely. Sort of like Tornado vs FireWire vs USB. The one that is technically superior today is not necessarily the one that wins long term, either. I had to check to see which one had the IEEE blessing. Zigbee. But Bluetooth is specified to a much higher speed - 2.1 Mb/s vs 250 Kb/s. Both are essentially link layer protocols, and in principle you can layer networking on top of that just as easily with one as the other. Zigbee is spread spectrum, direct sequence, and Bluetooth is also spread spectrum, but frequency hopping. Seems to me, people benefit financially from creating all of these redundant schemes, and that's why we have so many.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   7/9/2011 10:42:25 AM
NO RATINGS
WiFi is getting cheaper and cheaper, and with technologies such as UPnP, DLNA it can easily replace others.

Klinkenbecker
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Klinkenbecker   7/8/2011 8:31:26 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a very simplistic view of the landscape. RF4CE is being very slow to mature, mostly because of the huge installed base of IR. Zigbee is not a very power efficient protocol. Back in the 90's maybe, but advances in silicon have far outstripped the abilities of Zigbee and there are much more power efficient protocols out there. Mean-while, 802.11 (WiFi) implementations have been steadily whittling down their power requirements to the point it is becoming power competitive with both Bluetooth and Zigbee. Especially when the comparison includes the vastly superior capabilities and ubiquity of WiFi. Given that ubiquitous deployment of Wifi and the vastly superior protocol characteristics, WiFi is becoming more and more attractive in home control automation - particularly where a two tier control paradigm is envisioned (WiFi for user interaction, 'other', including HomePNA or perhaps proprietary protocols for sensing). This game is not over and is far more nuanced that the author would have us believe...

Bob Virkus
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
Bob Virkus   7/5/2011 11:22:46 AM
NO RATINGS
I all sounds like a good idea and very useful, but they are going have to come with a better name that can be more easily pronounced and remembered.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
KB3001   7/3/2011 6:32:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for this Cees. That concurs with my thinking.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: ZigBee RF4CE versus Bluetooth
t.alex   7/3/2011 12:44:30 AM
NO RATINGS
What are the products currently adopting RF4CE?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
Saturation
 
DCH0
 
realjjj
 
traneus
 
realjjj
 
realjjj
 
Doug_S
 
spike_johan
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...