Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Impact on UMC's rankings?
Peter Clarke   7/1/2013 4:26:46 AM
NO RATINGS
it is true that more competition in foundry FinFET offering is good. But UMC is struggling to keep on the pace at 28-nm/20-nm

Signing up with IBM is a necessary but not sufficient pre-condition to guarantee that UMC will get to FinFET deployment.

Ryszard.Milewicz
User Rank
Author
Re: Impact on UMC's rankings?
Ryszard.Milewicz   6/30/2013 7:13:56 PM
NO RATINGS
I think more competition in 14 nm process will be better for fabless IC designers.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Impact on UMC's rankings?
rick merritt   6/30/2013 5:35:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Good questions, and I look forward to hearing many answers.

Here are mine:

TSMC is the main source for the fabless world so they already hold the top ranking with the exception of Intel that is the sole source of a FinFET capability today but limited to a few cherry-picked customers. The issue for TSMC is not to lose its position by letting GloFo or others get to the next major semiconductor capabilty before them.

As for chip designers, only a few dozen groups that still do custom IC layout will need to understand and leverage the details of FinFETs. The rest of the chip design crowd will probably just see FinFETs as a term roughly synonomous with an advanced process versus a legacy one. That said, anyone in electronics who follows the underlying semiconductor technology and speifies foundry servcies probably knows and tracks milestones like this one.

 

kfield
User Rank
Author
Impact on UMC's rankings?
kfield   6/30/2013 5:02:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm curious whether this announcement will shore up the company's rankings and what the implications are for engineers? More alternatives? Better Prices? Something Else??



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...