@Brian: Perhaps it is a matter of trusting your supply chain.
If I were designing something that needed to be mega-safe (planes, submarines, space probes, industrial control systems ... I wouldn't even trust myself (but then, I know the sort of things I get up to :-)
In some respects, is this no different than a software programmer putting in "Easter Eggs". I know the implications could be a lot higher, but I think this has always been happening. Perhaps it is a matter of trusting your supply chain.
Hi Brian -- one problem with outsourcing is not knowing 100% what comes back in. Sometimes all the prime company does is verify the functionality of a complex function that was developed by a third party -- they don't examine the HDL or firmware code line-by-line -- so who knows what "back doors" have been added while no one was looking?
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.