Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
Genesis
Kevin Neilson   7/11/2013 12:45:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Wait a second--I hope this isn't true, because this is exactly what happened with the Genesis probe.  It returned to earth and the drogue was supposed to come out after it had decelerated to a certain speed, but the accelerometers were mounted upside down so the deceleration was interpreted as acceleration and the drogue never came out and the probe cratered in the desert.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: Quality Control and testing in Space Electronics
LarryM99   7/10/2013 11:55:08 PM
NO RATINGS
We can't necessarily be too smug about this. I seem to remember an American Mars probe that sailed right past that planet because someone put a period instead of a comma in a line of FORTRAN code. I have had friends that worked on the Saturn 5 that left because of the tension of building systems that could never be completely tested prior to a launch. We may be better off today with a combination of more experience and better test equipment, but we are also building more complex systems.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Dubious Source
Tom Murphy   7/10/2013 9:45:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not sure I'd put a lot of stock in an unidentified source and the Interfax news agency. I mean -- these are rocket scientists we're talking about, and they know how to install sensors.  In any case, how would they know at this point?

_hm
User Rank
CEO
Quality Control and testing in Space Electronics
_hm   7/10/2013 8:37:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Quality control in Space electronics is very essential. And this type of mistakes are often discovered. One common exapmple is polarized capacitor. Many times, they are mounted with polarity reversed.

Another aspect is testing. Testing is very improtant in this type of critical missions. It should try to encompass all this possibilities. And yes, poke yoke problem must also be avoided.

CMathas
User Rank
Manager
Re: Preventing Upside-Down Sensors
CMathas   7/10/2013 6:11:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Huge failure is right. One would think that there would be several tests and confirmations in place before actual launch. That's a huge loss of resources based on something that should have been easily caught.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Preventing Upside-Down Sensors
DrQuine   7/10/2013 4:43:31 PM
NO RATINGS
The use of keyed connectors that can only be assembled one way is a good precaution to prevent reversed connections.  Of course, if the connector is wired backwards that won't help.  The second essential step is to gather baseline data and confirm that the device is operating properly. If indeed the sensor was installed upside-down, it should have been reported inverted data when standing on the launchpad. Exhaustive testing certainly proves its worth if it can catch a tiny error before it causes a huge failure.

<<   <   Page 4 / 4


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).