@DocDivakar: ...it would be nice if you can dig up some story on what Tabula is up to these days...
I'm not allowed to say anything at the moment ... but I do hope to be able to report something that will blow your socks off in the not-so-distant future (so you had better make sure to wear elasticated socks for the forseeable future :-)
More distribution usually means more revenue, so, yes, both the distributor and the manufacturer should benefit from that. How much is the question. The buyer is probably going to order from one place or another, anyway, and if they wanted Lattice chips they can get them -- Lattice still gets the order, but perhaps at slightly different terms.
That's a good question, Patrick. It was a small move in the stock, and this announcement appears to be the only news that was out that day involving Lattice. The stock is up another 2 pennies today at $5.24, but still well below the 52-week high set of $5.71 in March.
@Patl0317: ...they must have a niche market or something else...
Well, in addition to a very good mid-level offering (in terms of capacilty, cost, performance, and features), they have the ultra low-power stuff they acquired when they purchased SiliconBlue, plus they have a very sophisticaled power/platform management family/suite.
The owner of Future (world's largest privately held distributor), would not sign this agreement if he did not think he could make money off of it. So, even though Lattice is a distant 3rd or 4th player in the FPGA game, they must have a niche market or something else that Miller sees where they can make a play.
In some cases the trend toward distributor as tech support and demand creator is smart, especially for small- to mid-size companies. But many designers complain that some suppliers take it too far and completely abdicate their responsibility (and opportunity?) to provide support and incorporate feedback from users in the field.
Some field support engineers from suppliers may have some thoughts on this.
Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.